Citation network
Van Orden Vs. Perry
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 2005
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Van Orden V. PerrySearch
-
s history, see School Dist. of Abington Township v. SchemppSearch
-
its responsibility to maintain a division between church and state nor evince a hostility to religion, e.g., Zorach v. ClausonSearch
-
While the Court has sometimes pointed to Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s role in American life. Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
s heritage. See, e.g. , McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
a message consistent with a religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause. See, e.g., Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
unconstitutional a Kentucky statute requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in every public schoolroom. Stone v. GrahamSearch
-
s holding would extend beyond the context of public schools to a legislative chamber, see Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
petitioner here apparently walked by the monument for years before bringing this suit. Schempp, supra, and Lee v. WeismanSearch
-
Clause questions can substitute for the exercise of legal judgment. See, e.g., School Dist. of Abington Township v. SchemppSearch
-
opinion. Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Van Orden v. PerrySearch
-
J. Van Orden V. PerrySearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-1500 Thomas Van Orden, Petitioner V. RickSearch
-
s history. As we observed in School Dist. of Abington Township v. SchemppSearch
-
See also Rosenberger v. RectorSearch
-
laws under the Establishment Clause. Over the last 25 years, we have sometimes pointed to Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Compare Wallace v. JaffreeSearch
-
U. S. 38 (1985) (applying Lemon ), with Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
Many of our recent cases simply have not applied the Lemon test. See, e.g. , Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSearch
-
Good News Club v. MilfordSearch
-
s history. As we explained in Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
School Dist. of Abington Township v. SchemppSearch
-
Clause permits a state legislature to open its daily sessions with a prayer by a chaplain paid by the State. Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
laws, which originated from one of the Ten Commandments, that prohibited the sale of merchandise on Sunday. McGowan v. MarylandSearch
-
or promoting a message consistent with a religious doctrine does not run afoul of the Establishment Clause. See Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
Walz v. TaxSearch
-
citing School Dist. of Abington Township v. SchemppSearch
-
U. S. 203 (1963), and Engel v. VitaleSearch
-
Compare Lee v. WeismanSearch
-
holding unconstitutional a prayer at a secondary school graduation), with Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
supra (upholding a prayer in the state legislature). Indeed, Edwards v. AguillardSearch
-
s holding would extend to a legislative chamber, see Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
this lawsuit. The monument is therefore also quite different from the prayers involved in Schempp and Lee v. WeismanSearch
-
War Veterans, Soldiers of World War I, Disabled Veterans, and Texas Peace Officers. Footnote 2 See also Engel v. VitaleSearch
-
Establishment Clause bars any and all governmental preference for religion over irreligion. See, e.g. , Cutter v. WilkinsonSearch
-
Saints v. AmosSearch
-
of Souter, J.) (discussing a number of permissible displays with religious content). Footnote 4 Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSearch
-
and Lee v. WeismanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial