Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bradshaw Vs. Richey

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 28, 2005

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 3 linked 27 unlinked
Show
  1. Mullaney Vs. Wilbur US Supreme Court · Jun 09, 1975
  2. Estelle Vs. Mcguire US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1991
  3. United States Vs. Lanier US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1997
  4. Per Curiam Bradshaw V. Richey
    Search
  5. Supreme Court of the United States Margaret Bradshaw, Warden V. Kenneth
    Search
  6. s trial counsel had been constitutionally deficient under Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  7. B) (Anderson 1982) under which respondent was convicted. See Richey v. Mitchell
    Search
  8. State v. Richey
    Search
  9. one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus. Estelle v. McGuire
    Search
  10. Bouie v. City
    Search
  11. U. S. 347 , 352 (1964), in violation of the Due Process Clause. 395 F. 3d, at 677 (citing United States v. Lanier
    Search
  12. doubt permits such a flatly countertextual interpretation of what the Ohio Supreme Court said, see Salinas v. United
    Search
  13. State v. Sowell
    Search
  14. Ohio St. 3d 322, 332, 530 N. E. 2d 1294, 1305 (1988) (citing Wareham v. State
    Search
  15. in which intent to kill was sought to be proved from the inherent dangerousness of the relevant felony. See State v. Phillips
    Search
  16. citing State v. Mullins
    Search
  17. see also Marks v. United
    Search
  18. whether respondent was at fault for failing to develop the factual bases for his claims in state court, see Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  19. e)(2). See Holland v. Jackson
    Search
  20. s holding that this default was not excusable under Coleman v. Thompson
    Search
  21. Strickland v. Washington
    Search
  22. See Richey v. Mitchell
    Search
  23. Salinas v. United
    Search
  24. Wareham v. State
    Search
  25. See State v. Phillips
    Search
  26. State v. Mullins
    Search
  27. Marks v. United
    Search
  28. Williams v. Taylor
    Search
  29. See Holland v. Jackson
    Search
  30. Coleman v. Thompson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial