Citation network
illinois Vs. Lidster
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Illinois V. LidsterSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Illinois V. LidsterSearch
-
but the state appellate court reversed. The State Supreme Court agreed, holding that, in light of Indianapolis v. EdmondSearch
-
s car as his castle, see, e.g., New York v. ClassSearch
-
will sometimes justify highway stops without individualized suspicion, see, e.g., Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
Brown v. TexasSearch
-
filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Souter and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Illinois v. LidsterSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Illinois V. LidsterSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1060 Illinois, Petitioner V. RobertSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Supreme Court agreed with the appellate court. It held (by a vote of 4 to 3) that our decision in Indianapolis v. EdmondSearch
-
Because lower courts have reached different conclusions about this matter, we granted certiorari. See Burns v. CommonwealthSearch
-
concerns will sometimes justify highway stops without individualized suspicion. See Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
That, in part, is because voluntary requests play a vital role in police investigatory work. See, e.g. , Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
-
hence, its constitutionality, on the basis of the individual circumstances. And as this Court said in Brown v. TexasSearch
-
stop was constitutional. The judgment of the Illinois Supreme Court is Reversed . Illinois v. LidsterSearch
-
s opinion explaining why our decision in Indianapolis v. EdmondSearch
-
cars. In short, the outcome of the multifactor test prescribed in Brown v. TexasSearch
-
Court and the State Supreme Court held that the Lombard roadblock was per se unconstitutional under Indianapolis v. EdmondSearch
-
of Indianapolis v. EdmondSearch
-
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
Illinois, Petitioner V. RobertSearch
-
See Burns v. CommonwealthSearch
-
See Michigan Dept. of State Police v. SitzSearch
-
Haynes v. WashingtonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial