Citation network
Doe Vs. Chao
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 24, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Doe V. ChaoSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Doe V. ChaoSearch
-
a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens and Breyer, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Doe v. ChaoSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Doe V. ChaoSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1377 Buck Doe, Petitioner V. ElaineSearch
-
s decision requiring proof of actual damages conflicted with the views of other Circuits, see, e.g., Orekoya v. MooneySearch
-
Wilborn v. DepartmentSearch
-
Waters v. ThornburghSearch
-
Johnson v. DepartmentSearch
-
Fitzpatrick v. IRSSearch
-
Compensation Programs v. NewportSearch
-
Los Angeles v. LyonsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. ArmySearch
-
stipulated order prohibiting the Department of Labor from using Social Security numbers in multiparty captions. Doe v. HermanSearch
-
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
Footnote 12 The Courts of Appeals are divided on the precise definition of actual damages. Compare Fitzpatrick v. IRSSearch
-
F. 2d 327, 331 (CA11 1982) (actual damages are restricted to pecuniary loss), with Johnson v. DepartmentSearch
-
only that they suffice to qualify under any view of actual damages. Doe v. ChaoSearch
-
Ginsburg, J., Dissenting Doe V. ChaoSearch
-
as a third liability-determining element. See Davis v. MichiganSearch
-
Cf. Barnhart v. SigmonSearch
-
quoting Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSearch
-
U. S. 19 , 31 (2001) (quoting Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
Congress wrote, United States v. MenascheSearch
-
quoting Montclair v. RamsdellSearch
-
award that need not be hinged to proof of actual damages. See Orekoya v. MooneySearch
-
quoting Fitzpatrick v. IRSSearch
-
cf. Quinn v. StoneSearch
-
Parks v. IRSSearch
-
But see Hudson v. RenoSearch
-
Molerio v. FBISearch
-
quoting Farrar v. HobbySearch
-
g)(4) as class actions. See, e.g. , Schmidt v. DepartmentSearch
-
Lyon v. UnitedSearch
-
award. See, e.g. , Tomasello v. RubinSearch
-
See also Johnson v. SawyerSearch
-
Rorex v. TraynorSearch
-
cf. Bowen v. GeorgetownSearch
-
INS v. Cardoza&nbhyphSearch
-
quoting Watt v. AlaskaSearch
-
might do). Doe v. ChaoSearch
-
s violation of the Act is in bad faith. See, e.g. , Albright v. UnitedSearch
-
see also, e.g. , Scrimgeour v. IRSSearch
-
Wisdom v. DepartmentSearch
-
Buck Doe, Petitioner V. ElaineSearch
-
Orekoya v. MooneySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial