Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Olympic Airways Vs. Husain

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 24, 2004

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 3 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Air France Vs. Saks US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1985
  2. Eastern Airlines, Inc. Vs. Floyd US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1991
  3. Lawrence Vs. Texas US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2003
  4. Syllabus October Term, 2003 Olympic Airways V. Husain
    Search
  5. Supreme Court of the United States Olympic Airways V. Husain
    Search
  6. as to Parts I and II. Breyer, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Olympic Airways v. Husain
    Search
  7. Opinion of the Court Olympic Airways V. Husain
    Search
  8. Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1348 Olympic Airways, Petitioner V. Rubina
    Search
  9. that occurred in connection with an international flight. In Air France v. Saks
    Search
  10. McCaskey v. Continental
    Search
  11. July 3, 2003), and Qantas Ltd. v. Povey
    Search
  12. of the protocol, and it entered into force in the United States on March 4, 1999. See El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui
    Search
  13. Montreal Protocol No. 4 does not apply. Olympic Airways v. Husain
    Search
  14. Scalia, J., Dissenting Olympic Airways V. Husain
    Search
  15. Warsaw Convention opinions have carefully considered foreign case law. See, e.g. , El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui
    Search
  16. courts have no role in enforcing. See Atkins v. Virginia
    Search
  17. s Court of Appeal, in an opinion by the Master of the Rolls that relied heavily on Abramson v. Japan
    Search
  18. Qantas Ltd. v. Povey
    Search
  19. Eleventh Circuit had not already ruled out Article 17 liability in substantially these very circumstances. See Krys v. Lufthansa
    Search
  20. Unless there has been an accident, there is no liability, whether the claim is trivial, cf. Lee v. American
    Search
  21. cases have looked to decisions of intermediate appellate foreign courts as well as supreme courts. See Air France v. Saks
    Search
  22. Olympic Airways, Petitioner V. Rubina
    Search
  23. In Air France v. Saks
    Search
  24. and Qantas Ltd. v. Povey
    Search
  25. See El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui
    Search
  26. El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui
    Search
  27. See Atkins v. Virginia
    Search
  28. Abramson v. Japan
    Search
  29. See Krys v. Lufthansa
    Search
  30. Lee v. American
    Search
  31. See Air France v. Saks
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial