Citation network
Locke Vs. Davey
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Locke V. DaveySearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Locke, Governor of Washington, Et Al. V. DaveySearch
-
majors had to be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling state interest under Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. HialeahSearch
-
between the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses. Walz v. TaxSearch
-
service or rite. It neither denies to ministers the right to participate in community political affairs, see McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
nor requires students to choose between their religious beliefs and receiving a government benefit, see, e.g., Hobbie v. UnemploymentSearch
-
J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Locke v. DaveySearch
-
Opinion of the Court Locke V. DaveySearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1315 Gary Locke, Governor of Washington, Et Al., Petitioners V. JoshuaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
had singled out religion for unfavorable treatment and thus under our decision in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. HialeahSearch
-
These two Clauses, the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, are frequently in tension. See Norwood v. HarrisonSearch
-
U. S. 455 , 469 (1973) (citing Tilton v. RichardsonSearch
-
between them. Walz v. TaxSearch
-
government funds and religious training is broken by the independent and private choice of recipients. See Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSearch
-
Zobrest v. CatalinaSearch
-
Witters v. WashingtonSearch
-
as prohibiting even indirectly funding religious instruction that will prepare students for the ministry, see Witters v. StateSearch
-
cf. Witters v. StateSearch
-
that question in the negative. He contends that under the rule we enunciated in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. HialeahSearch
-
rite. It does not deny to ministers the right to participate in the political affairs of the community. See McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
Hobbie v. UnemploymentSearch
-
Thomas v. ReviewSearch
-
theology is akin to a religious calling as well as an academic pursuit. See Calvary Bible Presbyterian Church v. BoardSearch
-
see also J. Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments, reprinted in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
Footnote 3 Davey, relying on Rosenberger v. RectorSearch
-
United States v. AmericanSearch
-
Cornelius v. NAACPSearch
-
of the Free Exercise Clause, however, we apply rational-basis scrutiny to his equal protection claims. Johnson v. RobisonSearch
-
see also McDaniel v. PatySearch
-
reprinted in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
see also Mitchell v. HelmsSearch
-
has also been solicitous in ensuring that its constitution is not hostile towards religion, see State ex rel. Gallwey v. GrimmSearch
-
provides greater protection of religious liberties than the Free Exercise Clause, see First Covenant Church of Seattle v. SeattleSearch
-
rejecting standard in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v SmithSearch
-
Munns v. MartinSearch
-
citing cases), for the reasons noted supra , the State has not impermissibly done so here. Locke v. DaveySearch
-
Scalia, J., Dissenting Locke V. DaveySearch
-
Justice Scalia, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting. In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. HialeahSearch
-
against religion. I We articulated the principle that governs this case more than 50 years ago in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
out for disfavor in this fashion. Davey is not asking for a special benefit to which others are not entitled. Cf. Lyng v. NorthwestSearch
-
s decision in Witters v. WashingtonSearch
-
s religious exercise, but we are not. See Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSearch
-
concrete harm with other forms of discrimination, see, e.g. , Brown v. BoardSearch
-
cf. Craig v. BorenSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial