Citation network
United States Vs. Banks
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 United States V. BanksSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States United States V. BanksSearch
-
Richards v. WisconsinSearch
-
a heightened justification when a reasonable suspicion of exigency already justifies an unwarned entry. United States v. RamirezSearch
-
F. 3d 699, reversed. Souter, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. United States v. BanksSearch
-
Opinion of the Court United States V. BanksSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-473 United States, Petitioner V. LashawnSearch
-
details that turn out to be important in a given instance, and without inflating marginal ones. See, e.g ., Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
have, however, pointed out factual considerations of unusual, albeit not dispositive, significance. In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
risk in any more detail than the law demands for an unannounced intrusion simply by lifting the latch. United States v. RamirezSearch
-
to say that the facts known to the police are what count in judging reasonable waiting time, cf., e.g. , Graham v. ConnorSearch
-
marks omitted). The Court of Appeals did not cite Ramirez . Nor did the appeals court cite United States v. ArvizuSearch
-
F. 3d, at 704, tell very little. v. LastSearch
-
U. S., at 72 (quoting Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Sabbath v. UnitedSearch
-
warrants, and some do not. See, e.g., Richards v. WisconsinSearch
-
of a minor offense is insufficient to make it reasonable to enter a dwelling to make a warrantless arrest. See Welsh v. WisconsinSearch
-
the gravity of the offense in determining whether exigent circumstances exist. See , e.g. , United States v. AquinoSearch
-
United States v. ClementSearch
-
of drug evidence as a factor in evaluating the reasonableness of waiting time. See, e.g. , United States v. GoodsonSearch
-
United States v. SpikesSearch
-
United States v. SpriggsSearch
-
United States v. JonesSearch
-
relying specifically on the concept of exigency, holding a 15-to-20-second wait reasonable). See also United States v. Chavez-MirandaSearch
-
United States v. MarklingSearch
-
Court. United States v. BanksSearch
-
United States, Petitioner V. LashawnSearch
-
Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
In Wilson v. ArkansasSearch
-
United States v. ArvizuSearch
-
Miller v. UnitedSearch
-
Sabbath v. UnitedSearch
-
See Welsh v. WisconsinSearch
-
United States v. AquinoSearch
-
United States v. GoodsonSearch
-
United States v. Chavez-MirandaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial