Citation network
iowa Vs. Tovar
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 08, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Iowa V. TovarSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Iowa V. TovarSearch
-
of the criminal process, see, e.g . , Maine v. MoultonSearch
-
U. S. 159 , 170, including a plea hearing, White v. MarylandSearch
-
he had a right to counsel both at the plea stage and at trial had he elected to contest the charge. Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
to forgo representation, any waiver of the right to counsel must be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, see Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
conveyed, Patterson v. IllinoisSearch
-
see Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
N. W. 2d 112, reversed and remanded. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Iowa v. TovarSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Iowa V. TovarSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-1541 Iowa, Petitioner V. FelipeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
to an accused who faces incarceration the right to counsel at all critical stages of the criminal process. Maine v. MoultonSearch
-
at which the right to counsel adheres. Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
White v. MarylandSearch
-
Brady v. UnitedSearch
-
requirements the Sixth Amendment imposes for waiver of counsel at a plea hearing, compare, e.g. , United States v. AkinsSearch
-
CA9 2002), with State v. CashmanSearch
-
Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
it does require that any waiver of the right to counsel be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, see Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
a defendant may be allowed to proceed pro se, he must be warned specifically of the hazards ahead. Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Id ., at 835 (internal quotation marks omitted). Later, in Patterson v. IllinoisSearch
-
questioning by police and prosecutor. At that stage of the case, we held, the warnings required by Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
burden to prove that he did not competently and intelligently waive his right to the assistance of counsel. See Watts v. StateSearch
-
State v. WiltSearch
-
and out of line with the pragmatic approach this Court described in Patterson v. IllinoisSearch
-
Ibid . Footnote 10 The United States as amicus curiae reads our decision in Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
Johnson v. ZerbstSearch
-
Patterson v. IllinoisSearch
-
Faretta v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Court. Iowa v. TovarSearch
-
Iowa, Petitioner V. FelipeSearch
-
United States v. AkinsSearch
-
State v. CashmanSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
See Watts v. StateSearch
-
Scott v. IllinoisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial