Citation network
Frew Vs. Hawkins
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Frew V. HawkinsSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Frew, on Behalf of Her Daughter, Frew, Et Al. V. HawkinsSearch
-
is a federal court order that springs from a federal dispute and furthers the objectives of federal law. Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
by the state officials when they asked the court to approve the consent decree. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
reduced to approving consent decrees and hoping for compliance. Once entered, that decree may be enforced. See Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
s traditional power to modify its decree in light of changed circumstances. See, e.g., Rufo v. InmatesSearch
-
F. 3d 530, reversed. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Frew v. HawkinsSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Frew V. HawkinsSearch
-
Court of the United States No. 02-628 Linda Frew, on Behalf of Her Daughter, Carla Frew, Et Al., Petitioners V. AlbertSearch
-
a cooperative federal-state program that provides federal funding for state medical services to the poor. See Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
Court issued a detailed opinion concluding that certain provisions of the consent decree had been violated. Frew v. GilbertSearch
-
was also a statutory violation of the Medicaid Act that imposed a clear and binding obligation on the State. Frazar v. GilbertSearch
-
the Eleventh Amendment does not bar enforcement of consent decrees in like circumstances. See, e.g., Kozlowski v. CoughlinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Wisconsin Hospital Assn. v. ReivitzSearch
-
status of the States by shielding them from suits by individuals absent their consent. Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. FloridaSearch
-
of federal law. Ex parte Young, supra. This standard allows courts to order prospective relief see Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
U. S. 267 (1977), as well as measures ancillary to appropriate prospective relief, Green v. MansourSearch
-
Edelman, supra , at 668. Consent decrees have elements of both contracts and judicial decrees. Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
Rufo v. InmatesSearch
-
The theory advanced by the state officials relies heavily on our decision in Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
the decree vindicates an agreement that the state officials reached to comply with federal law. Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
In exercising their prospective powers under Ex parte Young and Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
encompasses the traditional power of a court of equity to modify its decree in light of changed circumstances. In Rufo v. InmatesSearch
-
change in facts or law warrants their amendment. Id., at 393. See also Philadelphia Welfare Rights Org. v. ShappSearch
-
Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSearch
-
See Hutto v. FinneySearch
-
Court. Frew v. HawkinsSearch
-
Petitioners V. AlbertSearch
-
See Wilder v. VirginiaSearch
-
Frew v. GilbertSearch
-
the State. Frazar v. GilbertSearch
-
Kozlowski v. CoughlinSearch
-
Green v. MansourSearch
-
Young and Edelman v. JordanSearch
-
In Rufo v. InmatesSearch
-
Philadelphia Welfare Rights Org. v. ShappSearch
-
Milliken v. BradleySearch
-
Edelman v. JordanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial