Citation network
Dretke Vs. Haley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Dretke V. HaleySearch
-
Of the United States Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division V. HaleySearch
-
exception to the general rule when the applicant can demonstrate actual innocence of the substantive offense, Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
sentencing context, of the aggravating circumstances rendering the inmate eligible for the death penalty, Sawyer v. WhitleySearch
-
a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy and Souter, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Dretke v. HaleySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Opinion of the Court Dretke V. HaleySearch
-
Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Insti-Tutions Division, Petitioner V. MichaelSearch
-
sentencing context, of the aggravating circumstances rendering the inmate eligible for the death penalty. Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
Haley v. DirectorSearch
-
ED Tex., Sept. 13, 2001) p. 10, App. to Pet. for Cert. 49a (quoting Sones v. HargettSearch
-
Haley v. CockrellSearch
-
Id ., at 266 (quoting United States v. MikalajunasSearch
-
that challenges to the sufficiency of noncapital sentencing evidence are cognizable on federal habeas under Jackson v. VirginiaSearch
-
citing French v. EstelleSearch
-
the availability and scope of the actual innocence exception in the noncapital sentencing context. Compare Embrey v. HershbergerSearch
-
Reid v. OklahomaSearch
-
F. 3d 628 (CA10 1996) (same), with Spence v. SuperintendentSearch
-
will not disturb state court judgments based on adequate and independent state law procedural grounds. Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Brown v. AllenSearch
-
not to pass upon a defaulted constitutional claim presented for federal habeas review. Francis v. HendersonSearch
-
see also Fay v. NoiaSearch
-
The cause and prejudice standard is not a perfect safeguard against fundamental miscarriages of justice. Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
accord, Schlup v. DeloSearch
-
U. S. 298 (1995). We subsequently extended this exception to claims of capital sentencing error in Sawyer v. WhitleySearch
-
quoting Engle v. IsaacSearch
-
Carrier , supra , at 496 (quoting Reed v. RossSearch
-
often accompanying claims of actual innocence provide additional reason for restraint. For instance, citing Jackson v. VirginiaSearch
-
s protections to proof of prior convictions used to support recidivist enhancements. Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Apprendi v. NewSearch
-
simply assumed away by the dissent, see post , at 2 (citing Jackson , supra , and Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. Dretke v. HaleySearch
-
Stevens, J., Dissenting Dretke V. HaleySearch
-
conviction as a habitual offender, it follows inexorably that respondent has been denied due process of law. Thompson v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Jackson v. VirginiaSearch
-
for which failure to show cause is excused, Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
encroachment on the principles of comity and finality that underlie the procedural default doctrine. Dretke v. HaleySearch
-
Sones v. HargettSearch
-
United States v. MikalajunasSearch
-
French v. EstelleSearch
-
Compare Embrey v. HershbergerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial