Citation network
Republic of Austria Vs. Altman
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Republic of Austria V. AltmannSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Republic of Austria Et Al. V. AltmannSearch
-
b) This case is not controlled by Landgraf v. USISearch
-
foreign states and their instrumentalities some present protection from the inconvenience of suit, Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSearch
-
INS v. Cardoza&nbhyphSearch
-
Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Thomas, J., joined. Republic of Austria v. AltmanSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Republic of Austria V. AltmannSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-13 Republic of Austria Et Al., Petitioners V. MariaSearch
-
s complaint. Born in Austria in 1916, respondent Maria V. AltmannSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s specific claims. Only the former conclusion concerns us here. Presuming that our decision in Landgraf v. USISearch
-
s opinion in Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSearch
-
the default rule announced in our opinion in Landgraf v. USISearch
-
U. S., at 264 (quoting Bradley v. SchoolSearch
-
U. S., at 264 (quoting Bowen v. GeorgetownSearch
-
id. , at 269 (quoting Society for Propagation of the Gospel v. WheelerSearch
-
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
s provisions unquestionably apply to cases arising out of conduct that occurred before 1976. In Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSearch
-
Argentine Republic v. AmeradaSearch
-
See Underhill v. HernandezSearch
-
and in Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. RepublicSearch
-
applicable even in disputes concerning conduct that predated the letter. See, e.g., National City Bank of N. Y. v. RepublicSearch
-
arising from such acts must be obtained through diplomatic channels. Footnote 21 See, e.g., Flatow v. IslamicSearch
-
Sea Hunt, Inc. v. UnidentifiedSearch
-
Third Ave. Assoc. v. ConsulateSearch
-
analysis of the existence or nonexistence of any State Department statements on the subject. Republic of Austria v. AltmanSearch
-
Scalia, J., Concurring Republic of Austria V. AltmannSearch
-
s opinion, but add a few thoughts of my own. In Landgraf v. USISearch
-
opinion of Kennedy, J.). It justifies this approach on the basis of Hughes Aircraft Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
supra , at 951 (emphasis added), even if they happen sometimes to affect them. Republic of Austria v. AltmanSearch
-
Breyer, J., Concurring Republic of Austria V. AltmannSearch
-
Christian Dior could sue and collect (for clothes sold before the abdication). See Ex-King Farouk of Egypt v. ChristianSearch
-
see also Queen v. BowSearch
-
cf. Ter K. v. TheSearch
-
immunity, even though the events in question took place while a foreign government was its owner. Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSearch
-
Compare conduct-related immunity discussed in, e.g. , Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
U. S. 731 , 749 (1982) (absolute official immunity), Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co. v. RepublicSearch
-
Dayton v. CzechoslovakSearch
-
W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. EnvironmentalSearch
-
Dames & Moore v. ReganSearch
-
Hwang Geum Joo v. JapanSearch
-
Republic of Austria V. AltmannSearch
-
Landgraf v. USISearch
-
Petitioners V. MariaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial