Citation network
Hibbs Vs. Winn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Hibbs V. WinnSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Hibbs, Director, Arizona Department of Revenue V. WinnSearch
-
Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
Schacht v. UnitedSearch
-
alone, would do all the necessary work. In briefing United States v. GallettiSearch
-
and it requires that the legal right to disputed sums be determined in a refund suit. E.g., Bob Jones Univ. v. SimonSearch
-
s previous applications of that statute. See, e.g., California v. GraceSearch
-
s assertion, Arkansas v. FarmSearch
-
National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. OklahomaSearch
-
Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and Rosewell v. LaSalleSearch
-
merits of third-party constitutional challenges to tax benefits without mentioning the TIA. See, e.g. , Byrne v. PublicSearch
-
Griffin v. SchoolSearch
-
Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Scalia and Thomas, JJ., joined. Hibbs v. WinnSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Hibbs V. WinnSearch
-
Court of the United States No. 02-1809 J. Elliott Hibbs, Director, Arizona Depart- Ment of Revenue, Petitioner V. KathleenSearch
-
the detriment of black students, fastened on tui- tion grants and tax credits as a promising means to circumvent Brown v. BoardSearch
-
s equal protection requirement. See, e.g. , Griffin v. SchoolSearch
-
g Allen v. CountySearch
-
g 207 F. Supp. 349, 355 (ED Va. 1962) (closure of public schools enjoined). See also Moton v. LambertSearch
-
before the statute went into effect. Kotterman v. KillianSearch
-
Winn v. KillianSearch
-
bars constitutional challenges to state tax credits in federal court. Compare 307 F. 3d, at 1017, with ACLU Foundation v. BridgesSearch
-
s appropriate decision to consider a late-filed rehearing petition. Compare Young v. HarperSearch
-
timeliness of petition for certiorari measured from date court disposed of rehearing petition), with Missouri v. JenkinsSearch
-
quoting Department of Banking of Neb. v. PinkSearch
-
s compass, the statute controls our decision. See, e.g. , Kontrick v. RyanSearch
-
quoting Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSearch
-
Laing v. UnitedSearch
-
alone, would do all the necessary work. Earlier this Term, in United States v. GallettiSearch
-
a), 6502(a). Brief for United States in United States v. GallettiSearch
-
a). See Jefferson County v. AckerSearch
-
ibid . (quoting Enochs v. WilliamsSearch
-
a). See, e.g. , McGlotten v. ConnallySearch
-
Tax Analysts and Advocates v. ShultzSearch
-
s The Federal Courts and the Federal System 1173 (5th ed. 2003) (citing Rosewell v. LaSalleSearch
-
s previous applications of the TIA. In California v. GraceSearch
-
U. S., at 410 (quoting Perez v. LedesmaSearch
-
taxes). Federal-court relief, therefore, would have operated to reduce the flow of state tax revenue. See Arkansas v. FarmSearch
-
Dunn v. CareySearch
-
Wells v. MalloySearch
-
Franchise Tax Board of California v. UnitedSearch
-
Public Ed. & Religious Liberty v. NyquistSearch
-
E.g., Bob Jones Univ. v. SimonSearch
-
California v. GraceSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial