Citation network
Sosa Vs. Alvarez-machain
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Sosa V. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Sosa V. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
role in making common law. In Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
a private right of action is better left to legislative judgment in most cases. E.g., Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
and Bivens v. SixSearch
-
et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Sosa V. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
entitled to a remedy under either statute. I We have considered the underlying facts before, United States v. Alvarez-MachainSearch
-
Richards v. UnitedSearch
-
Sami v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Cominotto v. UnitedSearch
-
Beattie v. UnitedSearch
-
States , 756 F. 2d 91, 119 (CADC 1984) (Scalia, J., dissenting). Legal malpractice claims, Knisley v. UnitedSearch
-
SD Ohio 1993), allegations of negligent medical care, Newborn v. UnitedSearch
-
DC 2002), and even slip-and-fall cases, Eaglin v. UnitedSearch
-
courts generally applied the law of the place where the injury occurred. See Richards v. UnitedSearch
-
s liability. See, e.g. , Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSearch
-
Thomas v. FMCSearch
-
Quandt v. BeechSearch
-
Manos v. TransSearch
-
see also, e.g. , Dallas v. WhitneySearch
-
Cameron v. VandergriffSearch
-
U. S. 217 , 221 (1949). See also Sami v. UnitedSearch
-
Leaf v. UnitedSearch
-
see, e.g., Raskin v. AllisonSearch
-
frequently leads to the traditional application of the law of the jurisdiction of injury. See, e.g. , Dorman v. EmersonSearch
-
Bing v. HalsteadSearch
-
IIT v. VencapSearch
-
Black and White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. BrownSearch
-
common law has come an equally significant rethinking of the role of the federal courts in making it. Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
of them defined by express congressional authorization to devise a body of law directly, e.g. , Textile Workers v. LincolnSearch
-
order to create federal common law rules in interstitial areas of particular federal interest. E.g., United States v. KimbellSearch
-
decision of particular importance to foreign relations, such as the act of state doctrine, see Banco Nacional de Cuba v. SabbatinoSearch
-
right of action is one better left to legislative judgment in the great majority of cases. Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSearch
-
risks of adverse foreign policy consequences, they should be undertaken, if at all, with great caution. Cf. Tel-Oren v. LibyanSearch
-
see also Texas Industries, Inc. v. RadcliffSearch
-
we take today has been assumed by some federal courts for 24 years, ever since the Second Circuit decided Filartiga v. Pena-IralaSearch
-
s disagreement has been focused since the exchange between Judge Edwards and Judge Bork in Tel-Oren v. LibyanSearch
-
was enacted. See, e.g., United States v. SmithSearch
-
policeman who botches his warrant, even though that same officer might pay damages under municipal law. E.g., Groh v. RamirezSearch
-
Id., at 637. Footnote 2 See also Couzado v. UnitedSearch
-
quoting Donahue v. UnitedSearch
-
Martinez v. LamagnoSearch
-
cf. Eaglin v. UnitedSearch
-
In Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial