Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Smith Vs. Texas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 15, 2004

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 3 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Payne Vs. Tennessee US Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1991
  2. Boyde Vs. California US Supreme Court · Mar 05, 1990
    Relied / Followed
  3. Eddings Vs. Oklahoma US Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1982
    Relied / Followed
  4. Per Curiam Smith V. Texas
    Search
  5. Supreme Court of the United States Laroyce Lathair Smith V. Texas
    Search
  6. otherwise be affirmative responses to two special issues relating to deliberateness and future dangerousness. In Penry v. Johnson
    Search
  7. s appropriate sentence. Id., at 797 (quoting Johnson v. Texas
    Search
  8. s duty to consider mitigation evidence, violated the Eighth Amendment. Penry v. Lynaugh
    Search
  9. s evidence. We denied certiorari on May 15, 1995. Smith v. Texas
    Search
  10. II The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its opinion just prior to our decision in Tennard v. Dretke
    Search
  11. slip op., at 10) (quoting McKoy v. North
    Search
  12. quoting Robertson v. Cockrell
    Search
  13. slip op., at 13) (some internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Skipper v. South
    Search
  14. s, constitutes relevant mitigation evidence. See Wiggins v. Smith
    Search
  15. see 532 U. S., at 797 (citing Johnson v. Texas
    Search
  16. may have been more confusing for the jury to implement in practice than the state court assumed. Smith v. Texas
    Search
  17. Thomas joins, dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Walton v. Arizona
    Search
  18. In Penry v. Johnson
    Search
  19. Johnson v. Texas
    Search
  20. the Eighth Amendment. Penry v. Lynaugh
    Search
  21. Tennard v. Dretke
    Search
  22. McKoy v. North
    Search
  23. Robertson v. Cockrell
    Search
  24. Skipper v. South
    Search
  25. See Wiggins v. Smith
    Search
  26. of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Walton v. Arizona
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales