Citation network
Florida Vs. Nixon
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 13, 2004
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2004 Florida V. NixonSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Florida V. NixonSearch
-
prejudicial ineffective assistance of counsel necessitating a new trial under the standard announced in United States v. CronicSearch
-
s guilt-phase case to proceed essentially without opposition. Under Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
effectiveness should not be evaluated under the Cronic standard, but under the standard prescribed in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
which all other Members joined, except Rehnquist, C. J., who took no part in the decision of the case. Florida v. NixonSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Florida V. NixonSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 03-931 Florida, Petitioner V. JoeSearch
-
Defense counsel undoubtedly has a duty to discuss potential strategies with the defendant. See Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
s case. United States v. CronicSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
s charred body. Nixon v. StateSearch
-
Relying on United States v. CronicSearch
-
After the trial court rejected the claim, State v. NixonSearch
-
s strategy. Nixon v. SingletarySearch
-
Under Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
State v. NixonSearch
-
the Florida Supreme Court reversed and remanded for a new trial. Nixon v. StateSearch
-
Taylor v. IllinoisSearch
-
the defendant and obtain consent to the recommended course of action. A guilty plea, we recognized in Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
s behalf, Brookhart v. JanisSearch
-
s right to appeal. Nixon nevertheless urges, relying on Brookhart v. JanisSearch
-
The court first presumed deficient performance, then applied the presumption of prejudice that United States v. CronicSearch
-
s advocate. The Florida court therefore did not hold Nixon to the standard prescribed in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
see Bell v. ConeSearch
-
cf. Yarborough v. GentrySearch
-
s assessment of the evidence. See, e.g., Nixon v. SingletarySearch
-
for a brief period during the second day of the trial, Nixon remained absent throughout the proceedings. See Nixon v. StateSearch
-
to concede guilt was unreasonable and prejudicial under the generally applicable standard set out in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Florida, Petitioner V. JoeSearch
-
See Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Nixon v. StateSearch
-
Nixon v. SingletarySearch
-
Boykin v. AlabamaSearch
-
See Nixon v. StateSearch
-
Bell v. ConeSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial