Citation network
Miller-el Vs. Cockrell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 322 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Miller-El V. CockrellSearch
-
no evidence indicating a systematic exclusion of blacks, as was required by the then-controlling precedent, Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
petitioner guilty, and he was sentenced to death. While his appeal was pending, this Court established, in Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
under the standard set forth in Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
at step three is the persuasiveness of the prosecutor's justification for his peremptory strike. E. g., Purkett v. ElemSearch
-
that is accorded significant deference and will not be overturned unless clearly erroneous. Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
the neutral explanation of the prosecution, the peremptory strikes in the final analysis were race based. Cf. Reeves v. SandersonSearch
-
must be vacated because the jury selection procedures violated the Equal Protection Clause and our holding in Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
court of appeals should limit its examination to a threshold inquiry into the underlying merit of his claims. Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the use of peremptory challenges. Petitioner's trial occurred before our decision in Batson, supra, and Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. While the appeal was pending, on April 30, 1986, the Court decided Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
discrimination, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals remanded the case for new findings in light of Batson. Miller-El v. StateSearch
-
evidence. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied petitioner's appeal, and we denied certiorari. Miller-El v. TexasSearch
-
Miller-El v. JohnsonSearch
-
c)(2)). Citing our decision in Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
as a justification for striking a potential 332 juror for cause or by peremptory challenge. Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
Under Texas law at the time of petitioner's trial, an unwillingness to do so warranted removal for cause. Huffman v. StateSearch
-
Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
In Slack, supra, at 483, we recognized that Congress codified our standard, announced in Barefoot v. EstelleSearch
-
than fewer, restrictions on the power of federal courts to grant writs of habeas corpus to state prisoners. Duncan v. WalkerSearch
-
quoting Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
of the three-step framework mandated by Batson and reaffirmed in our later precedents. E. g., Purkett v. ElemSearch
-
Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
Hernandez, supra, at 359. As we confirmed in Purkett v. ElemSearch
-
and by whether the proffered rationale has some basis in accepted trial strategy. In Hernandez v. NewSearch
-
s state of mind based on demeanor and credibility lies 'peculiarly within a trial judge's province.' Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
U. S. 412 , 428 (1985), citing Patton v. YountSearch
-
saying that this includes the facts and circumstances that were adduced in support of the prima facie case. Cf. Reeves v. SandersonSearch
-
only twelve and a half percent of African-Americans. No explanation is proffered for the statistical disparity. Pierre v. LouisianaSearch
-
quoting Norris v. AlabamaSearch
-
questioning on mandatory minimums was employed by one of the same prosecutors who tried the instant case. Chambers v. StateSearch
-
quoting Hill v. TexasSearch
-
s side of the casewhich, though inadequate (as the Court holds) to make the absence of a claimed violation of Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
analyzing whether the applicant had made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See, e. g., Kasi v. AngeloneSearch
-
Wheat v. JohnsonSearch
-
from imposing additional requirements, and one such additional requirement has been approved by this Court. See Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
c)(1)(A). See, e. g., Bates v. LeeSearch
-
By asserting race-neutral reasons for the challenges, the State satisfied step two of Batson. See Purkett v. ElemSearch
-
This finding established that petitioner had failed to carry his burden at step three of the inquiry set out in Batson v. KentuckySearch
-
erroneous. Ante, at 341. The Court's main justification for this conclusion is supposed fidelity to Slack v. McDanielSearch
-
Weaver v. BowersoxSearch
-
Putman v. HeadSearch
-
Johnson v. GibsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial