Citation network
Clay Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 04, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Clay v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 537 U.S. 522 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Clay V. UnitedSearch
-
a petition for a writ of certiorari, or when the time for filing a certiorari petition expires. See, e. g., Gaspari v. BohlenSearch
-
Russello v. UnitedSearch
-
Columbus v. OursSearch
-
Gendron v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. TorresSearch
-
we granted certiorari, 536 U. S. 957 (2002), and now reverse the Seventh Circuit's judgment.2 1 See Derman v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kapral v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GambleSearch
-
United States v. BurchSearch
-
Kaufmann v. UnitedSearch
-
leaving nothing to be done at the court of first instance save execution of the judgment. See, e. g., Quackenbush v. AllstateSearch
-
a petition for a writ of certiorari, or when the time for filing a certiorari petition expires. See, e. g., Caspari v. BohlenSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
habeas-like relief. See Vasquez v. HillerySearch
-
United States v. NahodilSearch
-
d)(I)(A) to encompass review of a state conviction by this Court. See Derman v. UnitedSearch
-
Williams v. ArtuzSearch
-
Hill v. BraxtonSearch
-
Ott v. JohnsonSearch
-
Bronaugh v. OhioSearch
-
Anderson v. LitscherSearch
-
Smith v. BowersoxSearch
-
Bowen v. RoeSearch
-
Locke v. SaffleSearch
-
F.3d 770 , 774 (CAll 2002). 529 16, 23 (1983) (quoting United States v. WongSearch
-
United States v. HicksSearch
-
by reference to state-law rules that may differ from the general federal rule and vary from State to State. Cf. Artuz v. BennettSearch
-
Issed No. 01-1713. Republican Caucus of Pennsylvania House of Representatives V. ViethSearch
-
Jubelirer, Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania, Et Al. V. ViethSearch
-
Schweiker, Governor of Pennsylvania, Et Al. V. ViethSearch
-
Vieth Et Al. V. JubelirerSearch
-
And No. 02-135. Jubelirer, Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania, Et Al. V. ViethSearch
-
Anded No. 01-1340. Hohn V. UnitedSearch
-
F.3d 811 . No. 01-1693. Willingham V. LoughnanSearch
-
AL. C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Hope V. PelzerSearch
-
F.3d 1178 . No.01-1731. Rapier V. UnitedSearch
-
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of itshcroft V. FreeSearch
-
Syllabus CLAY v. UNITEDSearch
-
Gaspari v. BohlenSearch
-
Gendron v. UnitedSearch
-
See Derman v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial