Citation network
Woodford Vs. Garceau
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 25, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 202 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Woodford, Warden V. GarceauSearch
-
Act of 1996 (AEDPA) do not apply to cases pending in federal court on April 24, 1996-AEDPA's effective date. Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
respondent's request to look at provisions in chapter 154 is inapposite. Moreover, his reliance on McFarland v. ScottSearch
-
q)(4)(B), and Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. In Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
murder and sentenced to death. The California Supreme Court affirmed respondent's conviction and sentence, People v. GarceauSearch
-
Calderon v. UnitedSearch
-
of execution (or both) prior to that date. Five Courts of Appeals have ruled that AEDPA applies, see, e. g., Isaacs v. HeadSearch
-
Moore v. GibsonSearch
-
Gosier v. WelbornSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Williams v. CoyleSearch
-
Williams v. CainSearch
-
to reduce delays in the execution of state and federal criminal sentences, particularly in capital cases, see Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
see also Early v. PackerSearch
-
announced in Lindh in view of that emphasis, as have the majority of the Courts of Appeals. See, e. g., Holman v. GilmoreSearch
-
chapter 154 is inapposite to our inquiry here. Moreover, respondent's argument that our holding in Mc Farland v. ScottSearch
-
McFarland cannot carry the day for respondent. Similarly, the Ninth Circuit's and respondent's reliance on Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
Hohn, supra, at 241 (citing Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
which was well before AEDPA's effective date. In addition, the Court does not adequately distinguish Mc Farland v. ScottSearch
-
Hilton v. SouthSearch
-
the prisoner files an application for a writ of habeas corpus. I acknowledge that some language in Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
the amended statute would govern, except in certain capital cases subject to special rules not applicable here. Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
the principle that related statutory provisions are to be read together, see, e. g., Coit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLICSearch
-
U. S. 561 , 573 (1989) (citing Brown v. DuchesneSearch
-
Syllabus Woodford, Warden V. GarceauSearch
-
McFarland v. ScottSearch
-
and Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Court. In Lindh v. MurphySearch
-
People v. GarceauSearch
-
Isaacs v. HeadSearch
-
Holman v. GilmoreSearch
-
Mc Farland v. ScottSearch
-
Hohn v. UnitedSearch
-
Coit Independence Joint Venture v. FSLICSearch
-
Brown v. DuchesneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial