Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

inyo County Vs. Paiute-shoshone Indians of Bishop Community of Bishop Colony

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 31, 2003

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

43 entries 43 unlinked
Show
  1. Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone
    Search
  2. Of Bishop Colony - 538 U.S. 701 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Inyo County, California, Et Al. V. Paiuteshoshone
    Search
  3. Williams v. Lee
    Search
  4. See Will v. Michigan
    Search
  5. Pfizer Inc. v. Government
    Search
  6. in which the word appears, Georgia v. Evans
    Search
  7. Mike McGrath of Montana, and Christine O. Gregoire of Washington. 704 704 INYO COUNTY v. PAIUTE-SHOSHONE
    Search
  8. F. 3d, at 558 (quoting Williams v. Lee
    Search
  9. Ibid. (citing Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Chickasaw
    Search
  10. Id., at 568, n. 7 (citing Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Nevins
    Search
  11. who, under color of state law, deprive them of federally protected rights.4 In Will v. Michigan
    Search
  12. Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Manufacturing
    Search
  13. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 7-8 (quoting Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United
    Search
  14. Courts of Appeals have expressed divergent views on this question. See Native Village of Venetie IRA Council v. Alaska
    Search
  15. American Vantage Co. v. Table
    Search
  16. quoting White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams
    Search
  17. cf. Illinois v. Chicago
    Search
  18. Pennsylvania v. Porter
    Search
  19. see Brown v. Gardner
    Search
  20. cf. Lafayette v. Louisiana
    Search
  21. Brief for Respondents 45 (quoting Monell v. New
    Search
  22. Minnesota v. Mille
    Search
  23. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
    Search
  24. California v. Cabazon
    Search
  25. United States v. Cleveland
    Search
  26. with the Court that the judgment should be set aside, I do not join the Court's opinion. 2 Our holding in Will v. Michigan
    Search
  27. it must make its intention to do so 'unmistakably clear in the language of the statute.' Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
    Search
  28. see also Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  29. Syllabus Inyo County, California, Et Al. V. Paiuteshoshone
    Search
  30. Georgia v. Evans
    Search
  31. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Chickasaw
    Search
  32. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. Nevins
    Search
  33. In Will v. Michigan
    Search
  34. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United
    Search
  35. See Native Village of Venetie IRA Council v. Alaska
    Search
  36. White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Williams
    Search
  37. Illinois v. Chicago
    Search
  38. Brown v. Gardner
    Search
  39. Lafayette v. Louisiana
    Search
  40. Monell v. New
    Search
  41. Will v. Michigan
    Search
  42. Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
    Search
  43. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial