Citation network
Jinks Vs. Richland County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Jinks v. RichlandSearch
-
County - 538 U.S. 456 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Jinks V. RichlandSearch
-
d) is conducive to the administration of justice in federal court and is plainly adapted to that end. See McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
subdivisions. Congress lacks Article I authority to override a State's immunity from suit in its own courts, see Alden v. MaineSearch
-
before an Act of Congress may expose a local government to liability cannot possibly be reconciled with Monell v. NewSearch
-
nor is this the first case in which we have ruled on its authority to do so. In Stewart v. KahnSearch
-
absolutely necessary''' to the exercise of an enumerated power. See McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
state-law claim on the defendant's waiver of any statute-of-limitations defense in state court. See, e. g., Duckworth v. FranzenSearch
-
Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. MetzgerSearch
-
jurisdiction over the state-law claim even though it would more appropriately be heard in state court. See Newman v. BurginSearch
-
plaintiff to reopen the federal case if the state court later held the claim to be time barred. See, e. g., Rheaume v. TexasSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mine Workers v. GibbsSearch
-
cf. United States v. LopezSearch
-
exercise of Congress's Article I powers because it violates principles of state sovereignty. See Printz v. UnitedSearch
-
immune from congressional regulation. Respondent's reliance on Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSearch
-
Id., at 726. For purposes of Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
U. S. 64 (1938), for example, statutes of limitations are treated as substantive. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSearch
-
U. S. 99 (1945). Stewart v. KahnSearch
-
Congress lacks authority under Article I to override a State's immunity from suit in its own courts, see Alden v. MaineSearch
-
statement of the statute's applicability to such claims. Although we held in Raygor v. RegentsSearch
-
of Congress may expose a local government to liability cannot possibly be reconciled with our holding in Monell v. NewSearch
-
SOUTER, concurring. In joining the Court today, I do not signal any change of opinion from my dissent in Alden v. MaineSearch
-
Syllabus Jinks V. RichlandSearch
-
See McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Monell v. NewSearch
-
In Stewart v. KahnSearch
-
Duckworth v. FranzenSearch
-
See Newman v. BurginSearch
-
Rheaume v. TexasSearch
-
See Printz v. UnitedSearch
-
of Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
Stewart v. KahnSearch
-
Raygor v. RegentsSearch
-
United States v. MorrisonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial