Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Roell Vs. Withrow

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 29, 2003

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

27 entries 3 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Raddatz US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1980
  2. United States Vs. Emholt US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1881
  3. United States Vs. Will US Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1980
  4. U.S. 580 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Roell Et Al. V. Withrow
    Search
  5. alleging that they had deliberately disregarded his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. See Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  6. c)(1) so long as the parties have in fact voluntarily consented. See King v. Ionization
    Search
  7. interference with his obligation to ignore everything but the merits of a case. See Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor
    Search
  8. quoting United States v. Will
    Search
  9. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West
    Search
  10. without it, a magistrate judge cannot preside over a trial or enter judgment. Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am., Inc. v. Instromedix
    Search
  11. Sorenson v. Secretary
    Search
  12. Gomez v. United
    Search
  13. s view that implied consent suffices to give a magistrate judge dispositive authority over a case. Cf. Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy
    Search
  14. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public
    Search
  15. a second litigation of significant dimension.' Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West
    Search
  16. Glidden Co. v. Zda
    Search
  17. Wright v. United
    Search
  18. McDowell v. United
    Search
  19. Ball v. United
    Search
  20. defect of authority operates also as a limitation on this Court's appellate jurisdiction. Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United
    Search
  21. Syllabus Roell Et Al. V. Withrow
    Search
  22. of the Eighth Amendment. See Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  23. See King v. Ionization
    Search
  24. See Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor
    Search
  25. Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am., Inc. v. Instromedix
    Search
  26. Cf. Aetna Ins. Co. v. Kennedy
    Search
  27. Ayrshire Collieries Corp. v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial