Citation network
Lawrence Vs. Texas
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 26, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 558 (2003) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Lawrence Et Al. V. TexasSearch
-
statute was not unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court considered Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate its own moral code, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex. See County of Sacramento v. LewisSearch
-
relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education-and Romer v. EvansSearch
-
personal choice is somehow more legitimate or urgent. Stare decisis is not an inexorable command. Payne v. TennesseeSearch
-
S. W. 3d 349 (2001). The majority opinion indicates that the Court of Appeals considered our decision in Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
in liberty and privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 3. Whether Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
broad statements of the substantive reach of liberty under the Due Process Clause in earlier cases, including Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
of Sisters, 268 U. S. 510 (1925), and Meyer v. NebraskaSearch
-
but the most pertinent beginning point is our decision in Griswold v. ConnecticutSearch
-
the right to make certain decisions regarding sexual conduct extends beyond the marital relationship. In Eisenstadt v. BairdSearch
-
at 453. The opinions in Griswold and Eisenstadt were part of the background for the decision in Roe v. WadeSearch
-
a substantive dimension of fundamental significance in defining the rights of the person. 566 In Carey v. PopulationSearch
-
adults. This was the state of the law with respect to some of the most relevant cases when the Court considered Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
was understood to include relations between men and women as well as relations between men and men. See, e. g., King v. WisemanSearch
-
see also Post v. StateSearch
-
course of the last decades, States with same-sex prohibitions have moved toward abolishing them. See, e. g., Jegley v. PicadoSearch
-
Gryczan v. StateSearch
-
Campbell v. SundquistSearch
-
Commonwealth v. WassonSearch
-
court held that the laws proscribing the conduct were invalid under the European Convention on Human Rights. Dudgeon v. UnitedSearch
-
The State of Texas admitted in 1994 that as of that date it had not prosecuted anyone under those circumstances. State v. MoralesSearch
-
cases decided after Bowers cast its holding into even more doubt. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySearch
-
in Bowers would deny them this right. The second post-Bowers case of principal relevance is Romer v. EvansSearch
-
Just this Term we rejected various challenges to state laws requiring the registration of sex offenders. Smith v. DoeSearch
-
provisions in their own state constitutions parallel to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Jegley v. PicadoSearch
-
Powell v. StateSearch
-
rejected elsewhere. The European Court of Human Rights has followed not Bowers but its own decision in Dudgeon v. UnitedSearch
-
Kingdom. See P. G. & J. H. v. UnitedSearch
-
Modinos v. CyprusSearch
-
Norris v. IrelandSearch
-
to the judgments of the Court and to the stability of the law. It is not, however, an inexorable command. Payne v. TennesseeSearch
-
quoting Helvering v. HallockSearch
-
was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
opinion. It is so ordered. JUSTICE O'CONNOR, concurring in the judgment. The Court today overrules Bowers v. HardwickSearch
-
Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
see also Plyler v. DoeSearch
-
see also Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
see also Fitzgerald v. RacingSearch
-
Williamson v. LeeSearch
-
are not legitimate state interests. Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
Syllabus Lawrence Et Al. V. TexasSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial