Citation network
Maryland Vs. Pringle
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 15, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Syllabus October Term, 2003 Maryland V. PringleSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States Maryland V. PringleSearch
-
Brinegar v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 160 , 175, and that belief must be particularized with respect to the person to be searched or seized, Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
probable cause. Ornelas v. UnitedSearch
-
s attempt to characterize this as a guilt-by-association case is unavailing. Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
reversed and remanded. Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Maryland v. PringleSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Maryland V. PringleSearch
-
Supreme Court of the United States No. 02-809 Maryland, Petitioner V. JosephSearch
-
under arrest and transported to the police station. Later that morning, Pringle waived his rights under Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
and now reverse. Under the Fourth Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
s presence, is consistent with the Fourth Amendment if the arrest is supported by probable cause. United States v. WatsonSearch
-
see Atwater v. LagoSearch
-
see, e.g. , Ornelas v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and that the belief of guilt must be particularized with respect to the person to be searched or seized, Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
U. S. 85 , 91 (1979). In Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
As early as Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
s attempt to characterize this case as a guilt-by-association case is unavailing. His reliance on Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
suspected of criminal activity does not, without more, give rise to probable cause to search that person. Sibron v. NewSearch
-
Ybarra . Pringle and his two companions were in a relatively small automobile, not a public tavern. In Wyoming v. HoughtonSearch
-
than as a factor in the totality of the circumstances, is mistaken in light of our precedents. See, e.g., Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
Ybarra v. IllinoisSearch
-
Ornelas v. UnitedSearch
-
Court. Maryland v. PringleSearch
-
Maryland, Petitioner V. JosephSearch
-
Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
the Fourteenth Amendment, Mapp v. OhioSearch
-
Atwater v. LagoSearch
-
In Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
Locke v. UnitedSearch
-
Sibron v. NewSearch
-
In Wyoming v. HoughtonSearch
-
Illinois v. GatesSearch
-
United States v. WatsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial