Citation network
Castro Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 15, 2003
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Castro v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 02-6683 (2003) Syllabus October Term, 2003 Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
States Supreme Court of the United States Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which Thomas, J., joined. Castro v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 02-6683 (2003) Opinion of the Court Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
Ryan Castro, Petitioner V. UnitedSearch
-
motion. Id. , at 1274. Other Circuits have taken a different approach. E.g. , United States v. PalmerSearch
-
motion is his first, not his second. That is a very different question. Cf. Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
review where the lower court decision disfavors, but denying review where it favors, the Government. Cf. Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSearch
-
intent. Cf. Felker v. TurpinSearch
-
motion and recharacterize the motion in order to place it within a different legal category. See, e.g. , Raineri v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. DetrichSearch
-
United States v. MillerSearch
-
Raines v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SantoraSearch
-
Henderson v. UnitedSearch
-
McIntyre v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EatingerSearch
-
United States v. TindleSearch
-
to avoid inappropriately stringent application of formal labeling requirements, see Haines v. KernerSearch
-
s claim and its underlying legal basis. See Hughes v. RoweSearch
-
Andrews v. UnitedSearch
-
giving the litigant an opportunity to contest the recharacterization, or to withdraw or amend the motion. See Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. EmmanuelSearch
-
Morales v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SeesingSearch
-
over the federal judiciary. E.g. , McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
power. See Messenger v. AndersonSearch
-
and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. So ordered. Castro v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 02-6683 (2003) Opinion of Scalia, J. Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
The Fair v. KohlerSearch
-
Opinion of the Court Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Adamo Wrecking Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the Government. Cf. Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSearch
-
Cf. Felker v. TurpinSearch
-
Raineri v. UnitedSearch
-
See Hughes v. RoweSearch
-
See Adams v. UnitedSearch
-
McNabb v. UnitedSearch
-
See Messenger v. AndersonSearch
-
Opinion of Scalia, J. Castro V. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. KellySearch
-
United States v. PalmerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial