Citation network
Lee Vs. Kemna
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 22, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 362 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Lee V. KemnaSearch
-
Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
See Davis v. WechslerSearch
-
U. S. 22 , 24. This case fits within that limited category. The Court is guided here by Osborne v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 367 103, 124 (1990) (quoting James v. KentuckySearch
-
U. S. 341 , 349 (1984) (in turn quoting Staub v. CitySearch
-
App.113. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed Lee's conviction and the denial of postconviction relief. State v. LeeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
James v. KentuckySearch
-
Ford v. GeorgiaSearch
-
This case fits within that limited category. Our analysis and conclusion are informed and controlled by Osborne v. OhioSearch
-
See Osborne v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 103 , 122-125 (1990) (citing James v. KentuckySearch
-
Sullivan v. LittleSearch
-
State v. GadwoodSearch
-
State v. CuckovichSearch
-
State v. ScottSearch
-
State v. SettleSearch
-
State v. FreemanSearch
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
James v. KentuckySearch
-
and much else, tilts at a windmill of its own invention. 386 The dissent critiques at great length Henry v. MississippiSearch
-
See United States v. TraversSearch
-
Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Schlup v. DeloSearch
-
Staub v. CitySearch
-
In James v. KentuckySearch
-
NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
this case presents. Ante, at 382. While this description of Missouri law is dubious, see, e. g., State v. ScottSearch
-
on the merits was affirmed by the state appellate court because of an uncited procedural defect. See, e. g., James v. KentuckySearch
-
See Smith v. PhillipsSearch
-
State v. RobinsonSearch
-
Osborne v. OhioSearch
-
Douglas v. AlabamaSearch
-
See Elmendorf v. TaylorSearch
-
Henry v. MississippiSearch
-
Syllabus LEE v. KEMNASearch
-
See Davis v. WechslerSearch
-
State v. LeeSearch
-
Ford v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Osborne v. OhioSearch
-
See United States v. TraversSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial