Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Young Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 04, 2002

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 9 linked 19 unlinked
Show
  1. Rotella Vs. Wood US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2000
  2. United States Vs. Dalm US Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1990
  3. United States Vs. Beggerly US Supreme Court · Jun 08, 1998
  4. Holmberg Vs. Armbrecht US Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1946
  5. Bailey Vs. Glover US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1874
  6. United States Vs. Shabani US Supreme Court · Oct 03, 1994
    Relied / Followed
  7. Pepper Vs. Litton US Supreme Court · Dec 04, 1939
    Relied / Followed
  8. HardIn Vs. Boyd US Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1885
  9. BaldwIn County Welcome Center Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1984
  10. Young v. United
    Search
  11. States - 535 U.S. 43 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Young Et Ux. V. United
    Search
  12. mortgagee could sue in equity to foreclose mortgaged property even though the underlying debt was time barred. Hardin v. Boyd
    Search
  13. see also Beach v. Ocwen
    Search
  14. Irwin v. Department
    Search
  15. U. S. 38 , 48 (1998). See also American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah
    Search
  16. limitations periods in light of this back- 50 ground principle. Cf. National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  17. see also United States v. Energy
    Search
  18. acknowledged, however, that tolling might be appropriate in other cases, see, e. g., Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
    Search
  19. U. S. 147 , 151 (1984) (per curiam), and this, we believe, is one. Cf. Amy v. Watertown
    Search
  20. c)(1) contains a tolling provision. The lower courts have split over this issue, compare, e. g., Rogers v. Corrosion
    Search
  21. Products, Inc., 42 F.3d 292 , 297 (CA5), cert. denied, 515 U. S. 1160 (1995), with Garbe Iron Works, Inc. v. Priester
    Search
  22. Beach v. Ocwen
    Search
  23. American Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah
    Search
  24. Cf. National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma
    Search
  25. United States v. Energy
    Search
  26. Cf. Amy v. Watertown
    Search
  27. Rogers v. Corrosion
    Search
  28. Garbe Iron Works, Inc. v. Priester
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial