Citation network
Barnhart Vs. Walton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 27, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 212 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security V. WaltonSearch
-
interpretation, and if not, (2) whether the interpretation exceeds permissible bounds. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
the Agency's own longstanding interpretation, which should be accorded particular deference, North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. BellSearch
-
should be disregarded because its formal regulations were only recently enacted is also rejected. E. g., Smiley v. CitibankSearch
-
to the Agency considerable authority to fill in matters of detail related to its administration. See Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
to the contrary, that both fall within the Agency's lawful interpretive authority. See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
The District Court affirmed the Agency's decision, but the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed. Walton v. ApfelSearch
-
the Fourth Circuit's first holding conflicts with those of other Circuits, compare 235 F. 3d, at 189-190, with Titus v. Sulli-Search
-
van, 4 F.3d 590 , 594-595 (CA8 1993), and Alexander v. RichardsonSearch
-
Fed. Reg. 42774 (2000). Courts grant an agency's interpretation of its own regulations considerable legal leeway. Auer v. RobbinsSearch
-
see also United States v. MeadSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
duration. North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. BellSearch
-
should interpret the same statutory words differently in closely related contexts. See Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACFSearch
-
quoting Sorenson v. SecretarySearch
-
those regulations, perhaps in response to this litigation. We have previously rejected similar arguments. Smiley v. CitibankSearch
-
quoting Morton v. RuizSearch
-
U. S. 199 , 231 (1974))). If this Court's opinion in Christensen v. HarrisSearch
-
County, 529 U. S. 576 (2000), suggested an absolute rule to the contrary, our later opinion in United States v. MeadSearch
-
did not emerge out of notice-and-comment rulemaking. 533 U. S., at 230-231 (citing NationsBank of N. c., N. A. v. VariableSearch
-
legal lens through which to view the legality of the Agency interpretation here at issue. See United States v. MeadSearch
-
with the statute's plain language, 235 F. 3d, at 191. And, here, other courts have agreed. See Salamalekis v. CommissionerSearch
-
Newton v. ChaterSearch
-
Walker v. SecretarySearch
-
McDonald v. BowenSearch
-
authority to fill in, through interpretation, matters of detail related to its administration. See Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
As the Court acknowledges, the recency of these regulations is irrelevant, see ante, at 220-221 (citing Smiley v. CitibankSearch
-
dated back to the very origins of the statute, was more likely to reflect the single correct meaning. See, e. g., Watt v. AlaskaSearch
-
to another, so long as the most recent interpretation is reasonable its antiquity should make no difference. Cf. Rust v. SullivanSearch
-
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
were authoritative enough (or whatever-else-enough Mead requires) to qualify for deference. See United States v. MeadSearch
-
Syllabus Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security V. WaltonSearch
-
North Haven Bd. of Ed. v. BellSearch
-
Smiley v. CitibankSearch
-
See Schweiker v. GraySearch
-
See Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Walton v. ApfelSearch
-
Titus v. Sulli-Search
-
and Alexander v. RichardsonSearch
-
United States v. MeadSearch
-
See Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACFSearch
-
Sorenson v. SecretarySearch
-
Christensen v. HarrisSearch
-
N. A. v. VariableSearch
-
See United States v. MeadSearch
-
See Salamalekis v. CommissionerSearch
-
Cf. Rust v. SullivanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial