Citation network
United States Vs. Drayton
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 16, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 194 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus United States V. DraytonSearch
-
not to cooperate and to refuse consent to searches. Pp. 200-208. 195 (a) Among its rulings in Florida v. BostickSearch
-
to cooperate on a bus than in other circumstances. Lang's display of his badge is not dispositive. See, e. g., Florida v. RodriguezSearch
-
since he did nothing to intimidate passengers and said or did nothing to suggest that people could not exit. See INS v. DelgadoSearch
-
their right to refuse when seeking permission to conduct a warrantless consent search. See, e. g., Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
of the circumstances controls, without giving extra weight to whether this type of warning was given. See, e. g., Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
their consent to searches, provided a reasonable person would understand that he or she is free to refuse. Florida v. BostickSearch
-
F.3d 787 (2000). The court held that this disposition was compelled by its previous decisions in United States v. WashingtonSearch
-
F.3d 1354 (1998), and United States v. GuapiSearch
-
the street or in other public places and putting questions to them if they are willing to listen. See, e. g., Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
and request consent to search luggage-provided they do not induce cooperation by coercive means. See Florida v. BostickSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
California v. HodariSearch
-
officers have advised passengers of their right not to cooperate and to refuse consent to a search. In United States v. GuapiSearch
-
path to the exit. Id., at 1396. After its decision in Guapi the Court of Appeals decided United States v. WashingtonSearch
-
than in other circumstances. Respondents make much of the fact that Officer Lang displayed his badge. In Florida v. RodriguezSearch
-
officer approached him in an airport, showed him his badge, and asked him to answer some questions. Likewise, in INS v. DelgadoSearch
-
citizens of their right to refuse when seeking permission to conduct a warrantless consent search. See, e. g., Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
question whether, after the arrest of Brown, there were grounds for a Terry stop and frisk of Drayton, Terry v. OhioSearch
-
here is whether there was an illegal seizure 209 invalid as a product of the illegal seizure. See Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
id., at 509 (Brennan, J., concurring in result). Florida v. BostickSearch
-
id., at 437 (quoting Michigan v. ChesternutSearch
-
F.3d 787 , 788 (2000), elsewhere the court made it clear that it was applying the test in Florida v. BostickSearch
-
consent untainted by seizure. If there were, the consent would have to satisfy the voluntariness test of Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
-
them), id., at 81-82. Nor is it fairly possible to see the facts of this case differently by recalling INS v. DelgadoSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. DraytonSearch
-
Florida v. BostickSearch
-
See INS v. DelgadoSearch
-
Ohio v. RobinetteSearch
-
United States v. WashingtonSearch
-
and United States v. GuapiSearch
-
Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
See Florida v. BostickSearch
-
In United States v. GuapiSearch
-
In Florida v. RodriguezSearch
-
of Drayton, Terry v. OhioSearch
-
See Florida v. RoyerSearch
-
Michigan v. ChesternutSearch
-
of Schneckloth v. BustamonteSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial