Citation network
Holmes Group, Inc. Vs. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Holmes Group, Inc. v. VornadoSearch
-
Air Circulation Systems, Inc. - 535 U.S. 826 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2001 Syllabus HOLMES GROUP, INC. v. VORNADOSearch
-
a case arises under patent law is determined by what appears in the plaintiff's well-pleaded complaint. Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
contravene the face-of-the-complaint principle set forth in this Court's prior cases, see, e. g., Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSearch
-
that Vornado had no protectable trade-dress rights in the grill design. See Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. v. DuracraftSearch
-
grill design. It rejected respondent's contention that an intervening Federal Circuit case, Midwest Industries, Inc. v. KaravanSearch
-
exception to collateral estoppel applied in light of TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. MarketingSearch
-
Emphasis added.) We said in Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
Industries Operat- 1 Like Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
See, e. g., Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TexacoSearch
-
See Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. ConstructionSearch
-
U. S. 386 , 392 (1987) (emphasis added). As we said in The Fair v. KohlerSearch
-
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. ConstructionSearch
-
FDIC v. ElefantSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Takeda v. NorthwesternSearch
-
that our cases addressing removal require. See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSearch
-
a term familiar to all law students as invoking the wellpleaded-complaint rule. Cf. Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
U. S., at 813 (quoting Brief for Respondent in Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
in judgment). There is not. The cases relied upon by JUSTICE STEVENS and by the court in Aerojet-General Corp. v. MachineSearch
-
until the notice of appeal is filed. See Griggs v. ProvidentSearch
-
should be taken to the appropriate regional court of appeals rather than to the Federal Circuit. See Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
CA Fed. 1990) (en bane) (opinion of Markey, C. J., for a unanimous court) (citing, e. g., Rengo Co. v. MolinsSearch
-
Pioche Mines Consol., Inc. v. Fidelity-PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Lion Mfg. Corp. v. ChicagoSearch
-
jurisdiction. See Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Circuit was granted appellate jurisdiction over cases involving patent law claims, not issues. See Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
to 'arise under' federal law for purposes of federal question jurisdiction. Contrast, Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
For reasons stated by Chief Judge Markey, writing for a unanimous en banc Federal Circuit in Aerojet-General Corp. v. MachineSearch
-
adjudication and other determinations made in the same case. See id., at 741-744 (distinguishing Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
appeal is a relatively straightforward matter by reference to the complaint. As Judge Easterbrook explains in Kennedy v. WrightSearch
-
Syllabus Holmes Group, Inc. V. VornadoSearch
-
Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
See Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. v. DuracraftSearch
-
Midwest Industries, Inc. v. KaravanSearch
-
of TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. MarketingSearch
-
Like Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TexacoSearch
-
The Fair v. KohlerSearch
-
See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSearch
-
Cf. Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Aerojet-General Corp. v. MachineSearch
-
See Griggs v. ProvidentSearch
-
the Federal Circuit. See Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
Rengo Co. v. MolinsSearch
-
See Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
See Christianson v. ColtSearch
-
Contrast, Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Kennedy v. WrightSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial