Citation network
Sec Vs. Zandford
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 03, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 813 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Securities and Exchange Commission V. ZandfordSearch
-
thus to achieve a high standard of business ethics in the securities industry.''' Affili ated Ute Citizens of Utah v. UnitedSearch
-
of the statute's ambiguous text in the context of formal adjudication is entitled to deference. See United States v. MeadSearch
-
of business that operated as a fraud or deceit on a stockbroker's customer. As in Superintendent of Ins. of N. Y. v. BankersSearch
-
Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. O'HaganSearch
-
b), see United States v. O'HaganSearch
-
Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSearch
-
and affirm that disposition only if no set of facts would entitle petitioner to relief. See Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Id., at 16a, n. 1 (citing Zandford v. NASDSearch
-
Zandford v. NASDSearch
-
Zandford v. Prudential-BacheSearch
-
after the market crash of 1929. United States v. O'HaganSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
see also United States v. NaftalinSearch
-
Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 406 U. S. 128, 151 (1972) (quoting SEC v. CapitalSearch
-
the context of formal adjudication, is entitled to deference 820 if it is reasonable, see United States v. MeadSearch
-
b), Ma rine Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
was a fraud. United States v. DunnSearch
-
sale of the Woods' securities is concerned, the case is remarkably similar to Superintendent of Ins. of N. Y. v. BankersSearch
-
F. 3d, at 565. In fact, we rejected the Second Circuit's position in Superintendent of Ins. of N. Y. v. BankersSearch
-
and misrepresentations is illusory in the context of a broker who has a fiduciary duty to her clients. See Chiarella v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 406 U. S., at 153. More recently, in Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. v. UnitedSearch
-
of that benefit, but the connection between the deception and the sale in each case is identical. In United States v. O'HaganSearch
-
with a sale of securities, but it would not involve a deceptive device or fraud. Cf. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSearch
-
Syllabus Securities and Exchange Commission V. ZandfordSearch
-
Ute Citizens of Utah v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. MeadSearch
-
Superintendent of Ins. of N. Y. v. BankersSearch
-
See Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
SEC v. CapitalSearch
-
United States v. MeadSearch
-
Bank v. WeaverSearch
-
See Chiarella v. UnitedSearch
-
In United States v. O'HaganSearch
-
Cf. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSearch
-
United States v. DunnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial