Citation network
Christopher Vs. Harbury
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 20, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 403 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Christopher, Former Secretary of State, Et Al. V. HarburySearch
-
National Security Council, and officials of each, common- and international law tort claims, and claims under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
to dismiss, we accept Harbury's factual allegations and take them in the light most favorable to her. See Leatherman v. TarrantSearch
-
and injunctive relief,2 and money damages against the officials in their individual capacities on the theory of Bivens v. SixSearch
-
for declaratory or injunctive relief, and appealed only the dismissal of the Bivens causes of action. Harbury v. DeutchSearch
-
under that general rubric elsewhere, but if we con- 5 The District of Columbia Circuit denied rehearing, Harbury v. DeutchSearch
-
of rehearing en bane. 6 The petitioners did not challenge below the existence of a cause of action under Bivens v. SixSearch
-
in the prisonlitigation cases, the relief sought may be a law library for a prisoner's use in preparing a case, Bounds v. SmithSearch
-
or federal habeas petitions in criminal cases,8 or civil suits asserting family-law rights, e. g., Boddie v. ConnecticutSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
not in aid of a class of suits yet to be litigated, but of specific cases that cannot now 7See, e. g., Delew v. WagnerSearch
-
Swekel v. RiverSearch
-
Vasquez v. HernandezSearch
-
Foster v. LakeSearch
-
Williams v. BostonSearch
-
Bell v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Ryland v. ShapiroSearch
-
F.2d 967 , 974-975 (CA5 1983). 8 E. g., Smith v. BennettSearch
-
Mayer v. ChicagoSearch
-
access may allegedly have caused the loss or inadequate settlement of a meritorious case, e. g., Fos ter v. LakeSearch
-
the loss of an opportunity to sue, e. g., Swekel v. RiverSearch
-
suffered injury by being shut out of court. We indicated as much in our most recent case on denial of access, Lewis v. CaseySearch
-
of this Court have grounded the right of access to courts in the Article IV Privileges and Immunities Clause, Chambers v. BaltimoreSearch
-
House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 79 (1873), the First Amendment Petition Clause, Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. NLRBSearch
-
California Motor Transport Co. v. TruckingSearch
-
Unlimited, 404 U. S. 508 , 513 (1972), the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, Murray v. GiarratanoSearch
-
Walters v. NationalSearch
-
of Radiation Survivors, 473 U. S. 305 , 335 (1985), and the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection, Pennsylvania v. FinleySearch
-
U. S. 551 , 557 (1987), and Due Process Clauses, Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
be addressed by allegations in the complaint sufficient to give fair notice to a defendant. See generally Swierkiewicz v. SoremaSearch
-
concerns for the separation of powers in trenching on matters committed to the other branches. See Department of Navy v. EganSearch
-
Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. WatermanSearch
-
resolve such constitutional issues ought to be avoided where possible, cf. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. RuckerSearch
-
Tr. of Proceedings in Harbury v. DeutchSearch
-
cf. United States v. ShearerSearch
-
of an employee resulting in wrongful death in the military context). But see U. S. Information Agency v. KrcSearch
-
or the presence requirements. While there is room to argue for an exception to presence in some situations, cf. Jenco v. IslamicSearch
-
consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. JUSTICE THOMAS, concurring in the judgment. In Lewis v. CaseySearch
-
necessary to state a backward-looking access claim. 423 the right of access differently, see Harbury v. DeutchSearch
-
Syllabus Christopher, Former Secretary of State, Et Al. V. HarburySearch
-
Bivens v. SixSearch
-
See Leatherman v. TarrantSearch
-
of Bivens v. SixSearch
-
Harbury v. DeutchSearch
-
Bounds v. SmithSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial