Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gonzaga Univ. Vs. Doe

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 20, 2002

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 3 linked 60 unlinked
Show
  1. Blessing Vs. Freestone US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1997
  2. Alexander Vs. Sandoval US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2001
  3. Maine Vs. Thiboutot US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1980
  4. U.S. 273 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Gonzaga University Et Al. V. Doe
    Search
  5. a), 1232g(f). In Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  6. only in Wright v. Roanoke
    Search
  7. Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U. S. 418 , 426, 432, and Wilder v. Virginia
    Search
  8. statutes whose language did not unambiguously confer such a right upon the Act's beneficiaries. See, e. g., Suter v. Artist
    Search
  9. it must first be determined whether Congress intended to create afederal right, see Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington
    Search
  10. a statute to create private rights, its text must be phrased in terms of the persons benefited. E. g., Cannon v. University
    Search
  11. n. 13. Once the plaintiff demonstrates that the statute confers rights on a particular class of persons, California v. Sierra
    Search
  12. posed in the first paragraph of this opinion, a question reserved in Owasso Independent School Dist. No. 1-011 v. Falvo
    Search
  13. Compare Gundlach v. Reinstein
    Search
  14. and Meury v. Eagle-Union
    Search
  15. Community School Corp., 714 N. E. 2d 233, 239 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (same), with Falvo v. Owasso
    Search
  16. and Brown v. Oneonta
    Search
  17. here, that spending legislation drafted in terms resembling those of FERPA can confer enforceable rights. In Maine v. Thiboutot
    Search
  18. agency in violation of the Social Security Act. Id., at 4. A year later, in Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  19. Since Pennhurst, only twice have we found spending legislation to give rise to enforceable rights. In Wright v. Roanoke
    Search
  20. Id., at 426. Three years later, in Wilder v. Virginia
    Search
  21. recent decisions, however, have rejected attempts to infer enforceable rights from Spending Clause statutes. In Suter v. Artist
    Search
  22. enforcement, even by a class of the statute's principal beneficiaries. Id., at 357. Similarly, in Blessing v. Freestone
    Search
  23. Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington
    Search
  24. Cannon v. University
    Search
  25. Smith v. Robinson
    Search
  26. California v. Sierra
    Search
  27. Chapman v. Houston
    Search
  28. in discerning whether personal rights exist in the implied right of action context. Compare Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los
    Search
  29. Wright v. Roanoke
    Search
  30. U. S. 329 , 341 (1997). See also Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National
    Search
  31. with Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  32. and California v. Sierra
    Search
  33. are separation-of-powers concerns within the Federal Government the only guideposts in this sort of analysis. See Will v. Michigan
    Search
  34. quoting Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon
    Search
  35. citing Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  36. language critical to showing the requisite congressional intent to create new rights. Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  37. U. S., at 690-693. See also Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  38. quoting California v. Sierra
    Search
  39. Regents of Univ. of Mich. v. Ewing
    Search
  40. That is a far cry from the sort of individualized, concrete monetary entitlement found enforceable in Maine v. Thiboutot
    Search
  41. U. S. 1 (1980), Wright, and Wilder v. Virginia
    Search
  42. Ibid. This argument was rejected in Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search
  43. cases are helpful indications of that intent. See, e. g., Blessing v. Freestone
    Search
  44. Suter v. Artist
    Search
  45. Wilder v. Virginia
    Search
  46. claims that would limit, or forbid, such practices as peer grading, see Owasso Independent School Dist. No. 1-011 v. Falvo
    Search
  47. U. S. 426 (2002), teacher evaluations, see Moore v. Hyche
    Search
  48. recommendations, see Price v. Young
    Search
  49. Syllabus Gonzaga University Et Al. V. Doe
    Search
  50. In Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial