Citation network
Hope Vs. Pelzer
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 730 (2002) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Hope V. PelzerSearch
-
are those that are 'totally without penological justification.''' Rhodes v. ChapmanSearch
-
to the inmates' health or safety, Hudson v. M cMillianSearch
-
U. S. 1 , 8, a state of mind that can be inferred from the fact that the risk of harm is obvious, Farmer v. BrennanSearch
-
willfully and under color of law to deprive a person of constitutional rights. This Court's opinion in United States v. LanierSearch
-
that their conduct was unconstitutional. In addition, binding Circuit precedent should have given them notice. Gates v. CollierSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
forms of corporal punishment impermissible, including handcuffing inmates to fences or cells for long periods, and Ort v. WhiteSearch
-
to determine whether the Court of Appeals' qualified immunity holding comports with our decision in United States v. LanierSearch
-
favorable to Hope, the nonmoving party. 240 F.3d 975 , 977 (CAll 2001) (case below). We do the same. Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
U. S. 194 , 201 (2001). The Court of Appeals also referenced facts established in Austin v. HopperSearch
-
Id., at 981. The court then concluded that the facts in the two precedents on which Hope primarily relied-Ort v. WhiteSearch
-
F.2d 318 (CAll 1987), and Gates v. CollierSearch
-
qualified immunity analysis is whether plaintiff's allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation. Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
system of justice has consistently moved away from forms of punishment similar to hitching posts in prisons. In Gates v. CollierSearch
-
to the inmates' health or safety. Hudson v. McMillianSearch
-
We may infer the existence of this subjective state of mind from the fact that the risk of harm is obvious. Farmer v. BrennanSearch
-
by considering the pattern of treatment that inmates generally received when attached to the hitching post. In Austin v. HopperSearch
-
Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
and under color of law to deprive a person of rights protected by the Constitution. In United States v. LanierSearch
-
U. S. 259 (1997), we held that the defendant was entitled 9 See, e. g., Suissa v. FultonSearch
-
Lassiter v. AlabamaSearch
-
Hill v. DekalbSearch
-
to the one in issue. Id., at 263 (citing United States v. LanierSearch
-
the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit before 1981 are binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit today. See Bonner v. PrichardSearch
-
Court decision finding a number of constitutional violations in the administration of Mississippi's prisons. Gates v. CollierSearch
-
in a case decided by the Eleventh Circuit in 1987 sent the same message to reasonable officers in that Circuit. In Ort v. WhiteSearch
-
Id., at 103. The findings in Austin v. HopperSearch
-
distinguishable on their own terms. 12 But regardless, they would be no match for the Circuit precedents13 in Gates v. CollierSearch
-
was unconstitutional, and Ort v. WhiteSearch
-
In three of the decisions, the inmates were given the choice between working or being restrained. See Whitson v. GillikinSearch
-
Dale v. MurphySearch
-
Ashby v. DeesSearch
-
NE (ND Ala., Dec. 27, 1994), p. 6. In others, the inmates were offered regular water and bathroom breaks. See Lane v. FindleySearch
-
Williamson v. AndersonSearch
-
Hollis v. FolsomSearch
-
No. CV-94-T-0052-N (MD Ala., Nov. 4, 1994), p. 9. Finally, in Vinson v. ThompsonSearch
-
infliction of punishment is unconstitutional, even in the prison context, see supra, at 737 (citing Whitley v. AlbersSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Trop v. DullesSearch
-
Ante, at 739 (quoting Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
then qualified immunity does not apply. Saucier v. KatzSearch
-
officials can still 10 Cf. Saucier v. KatzSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial