Citation network
Sattazahn Vs. Pennsylvania
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 04, 2002
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 101 (2002) October Term, 2002 Syllabus Sattazahn V. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
imposed in connection with the initial conviction raises no doublejeopardy bar to a death sentence on retrial. Stroud v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 251 U. S. 15 . While, in the line of cases commencing with Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
findings that the government failed to prove one or more aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt, Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
Pp. 109-110. (c) Dictum in United States v. ScottSearch
-
murder. It accordingly reversed petitioner's first-degree murder conviction and remanded for a new trial. Commonwealth v. SattazahnSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Court affirmed the denial, App. 73, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declined to review the ruling, Commonwealth v. SattazahnSearch
-
the sentence of death on retrial. 563 Pa., at 551, 763 A. 2d, at 369. Relying on its earlier decision in Commonwealth v. MartoranoSearch
-
to that offense, the defendant may neither be tried nor punished a second time for the same offense. North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
imposed in connection with the initial conviction raises no double-jeopardy bar to a death sentence on retrial. Stroud v. UnitedSearch
-
who did not have to make any further findings in order to impose the death penalty. Id., at 18. In Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
bars a State from seeking the death penalty on retrial. Id., at 445 (quoting State ex rel. Westfall 107 v. MasonSearch
-
double-jeopardy protections. Id., at 446. Later decisions refined Bullington's rationale. In Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
failed to prove one or more aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt. A later case in the line, Poland v. ArizonaSearch
-
Richardson v. UnitedSearch
-
Clause. Recent developments, however, have illuminated this part of our jurisprudence. Our decision in Apprendi v. NewSearch
-
Just last Term we recognized the import of Apprendi in the context of capital-sentencing proceedings. In Ring v. ArizonaSearch
-
for purposes of the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy Clause. Cf. Monge v. CaliforniaSearch
-
never terminated with respect to either. Cf. Green v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 355 U. S. 184 , 189 (1957) (citing United States v. BallSearch
-
Selvester v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 170 U. S. 262, 269 (1898). IV The dissent reads the Court's decision in United States v. ScottSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Green v. UnitedSearch
-
where the case must be retried anyway, post, at 124 (quoting Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
the Court's opinion in this case. I do not join Part III, which would further extend the reach of Apprendi v. NewSearch
-
see also Ring 117 v. ArizonaSearch
-
Id., at 619. I would resolve petitioner's double jeopardy claim on the sole ground that under Bullington v. MissouriSearch
-
barring retrial. Because death penalty sentencing proceedings bear the hallmarks of a trial, we held in Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
Po land v. ArizonaSearch
-
rule recognized in North Carolina v. PearceSearch
-
for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Richardson v. UnitedSearch
-
ante, at 107108 (quoting Arizona v. RumseySearch
-
United States v. ScottSearch
-
Burks v. UnitedSearch
-
for Sattazahn, the Double Jeopardy Clause barred Pennsylvania from seeking the death penalty a second time. ardson v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MartinSearch
-
See, e. g., Crist v. BretzSearch
-
see, e. g., Downum v. UnitedSearch
-
e., it justifies a trial court's declaration of a mistrial and the defendant's subsequent reprosecution. Arizona v. WashingtonSearch
-
contemplate the possibility of immediate reprosecution without an appeal, it has analyzed them as mistrials. See Lee v. UnitedSearch
-
id., at 95 (quoting Green v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial