Citation network
Glover Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 09, 2001
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Glover v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 531 U.S. 198 (2001) October Term, 2000 Syllabus Glover V. UnitedSearch
-
a 6- to 21-month sentencing increase was not significant enough to amount to prejudice for purposes of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
increase is not prejudice under Strickland. The Seventh Circuit drew the substance of its rule from Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
explained last Term that the Lockhart holding does not supplant the Strickland analysis. See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
dence suggests that any amount of actual jail time has Sixth Amendment significance. E. g., Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
to group money laundering counts with other counts for various reasons. 201 See, e. g., United States v. LombardiSearch
-
United States v. PorterSearch
-
United States v. TaylorSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. HarperSearch
-
United States v. WilsonSearch
-
to 21 months in a defendant's sentence was not significant enough to amount to prejudice for purposes of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
prejudice within the meaning of Strickland. See App. to Reply Brief for Petitioner la-22a. Citing Durrive v. UnitedSearch
-
States 18. It appears the Seventh Circuit drew the substance of its no-prejudice rule from our opinion in Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
explained last Term that our holding in Lockhart does not supplant the Strickland analysis. See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Cases such as Nix v. WhitesideSearch
-
U. S. 157 (1986), and Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
our jurisprudence suggests that any amount of actual jail time has Sixth Amendment significance. Compare Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
counsel must be provided when a defendant is tried for a crime that results in a sentence of imprisonment), with Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
punishment was imprisonment for six months or more. See 204 Argersinger, supra, at 29 (citing Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
relevant increase is to be measured in absolute terms or by some fraction of the total authorized sentence. See Martin v. UnitedSearch
-
discretion such as the Sentencing Guidelines it cannot serve as a bar to a showing of prejudice. Compare Spriggs v. CollinsSearch
-
under the Texas discretionary sentencing scheme), with United States v. PhillipsSearch
-
the Court of Appeals. In the ordinary course we do not decide questions neither raised nor resolved below. See Taylor v. FreelandSearch
-
Syllabus Glover V. UnitedSearch
-
of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
See Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
United States v. LombardiSearch
-
Citing Durrive v. UnitedSearch
-
and Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
Compare Argersinger v. HamlinSearch
-
Scott v. IllinoisSearch
-
Duncan v. LouisianaSearch
-
See Martin v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Spriggs v. CollinsSearch
-
See Taylor v. FreelandSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial