Citation network
Cook Vs. Gralike
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 28, 2001
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 510 (2001) October Term, 2000 Syllabus Cook V. GralikeSearch
-
EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 99-929. Argued November 6, 2000-Decided February 28, 2001 In U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
the Constitution's adoption, what they were before, except insofar as they are abridged by that instrument. Sturges v. CrownSearch
-
to prescribe the procedural mechanisms for holding congressional elections, e. g., Tashjian v. RepublicanSearch
-
and safeguards which experience shows are necessary to enforce the fundamental right involved. See, e. g., Smiley v. HolmSearch
-
text and to disfavor those who either oppose term limits entirely or would prefer a different proposal. Cf. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSearch
-
VIII, handicapping them at the most crucial stage in the election processthe instant before the vote is cast, Anderson v. MartinSearch
-
JUSTICE STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court. In U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
F. 3d, at 922.9 7See League of Women Voters of Me. v. GwadoskySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Donovan v. PriestSearch
-
as an appellee. In view of Harmon's participation, there is no contention that this case is moot. See Storer v. BrownSearch
-
cl. 1.12 Because these two arguments rely on different sources of state power, it is 10 See Miller v. MooreSearch
-
F.3d 1119 (CA8 1999) (Nebraska initiative invalidated on Article V andSearch
-
Barker v. HazeltineSearch
-
League of Women Voters of Me. v. GwadoskySearch
-
Article v. groundsSearch
-
Bramberg v. JonesSearch
-
Article v. groundsSearch
-
Morrissey v. StateSearch
-
Article v. andSearch
-
Simpson v. CenarrusaSearch
-
Article v. groundsSearch
-
In re Initiative Petition No. 364, 930 P. 2d 186 (Okla. 1996) (Oklahoma initiative invalidated on Article V andSearch
-
reserved, much less that such a right would apply to federal representatives. See U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
cf. McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
see United States v. ClassicSearch
-
to prescribe the procedural mechanisms for holding congressional elections. Tashjian v. RepublicanSearch
-
see also Smiley v. HolmSearch
-
see also U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
Anderson v. MarSearch
-
As the Court observed in U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
Amendment grounds have rarely distinguished between the rights of candidates and the rights of voters. In Bullock v. CarterSearch
-
And in Anderson v. CelebrezzeSearch
-
Clark v. CommunitySearch
-
by the candidate, and therefore ran afoul of cases such as Wooley v. MaynardSearch
-
out have no means of replying to their designation which would be equally effective with the voter. In Anderson v. MartinSearch
-
of term limits is paramount. Although uttered in a different context, what we said in Po lice Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
Syllabus Cook V. GralikeSearch
-
In U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
-
Sturges v. CrownSearch
-
Tashjian v. RepublicanSearch
-
Cf. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSearch
-
Anderson v. MartinSearch
-
of the Court. In U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial