Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Shaw Vs. Murphy

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 18, 2001

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 7 linked 23 unlinked
Show
  1. Pell Vs. Procunier US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1974
  2. Procunier Vs. Martinez US Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1974
  3. Johnson Vs. Avery US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1969
  4. Thornburgh Vs. Abbott US Supreme Court · May 15, 1989
  5. Turner Vs. Safley US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1987
  6. Wolff Vs. Mcdonnell US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974
  7. Block Vs. Rutherford US Supreme Court · Jul 03, 1984
  8. U.S. 223 (2001) October Term, 2000 Syllabus Shaw Etal. V. Murphy
    Search
  9. to other inmates. In granting petitioners summary judgment, the District Court applied the decision in Turner v. Safley
    Search
  10. Moreover, because courts are ill equipped to deal with the complex and intractable problems of prisons, Procunier v. Martinez
    Search
  11. Assistant Attorney 225 JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Under our decision in Turner v. Safley
    Search
  12. App. to Pet. for Cert. 24. The District Court then applied our decision in Turner v. Safley
    Search
  13. Murphy's First Amendment claim. Other Courts of Appeals have rejected similar claims. See, e. g., Gibbs v. Hopkins
    Search
  14. Smith v. Maschner
    Search
  15. Gassler v. Rayl
    Search
  16. Jones v. North
    Search
  17. Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc., 433 U. S. 119 , 139 (1977) (Marshall, J., dissenting) (quoting Ruffin v. Commonwealth
    Search
  18. protections. Inmates 229 retain, for example, the right to be free from racial discrimination, Lee v. Washington
    Search
  19. U. S. 333 (1968) (per curiam), the right to due process, Wolff v. McDonnell
    Search
  20. Ibid. (quoting Block v. Rutherford
    Search
  21. of the penological interest served by the rule.''' 195 F.3d 1121 , 1127 (CA9 1999) (quoting Bradley v. Hall
    Search
  22. adequate opportunity to present claimed violations of fundamental constitutional rights to the courts.''' Lewis v. Casey
    Search
  23. U. S. 343 , 350-351 (1996) (quoting Bounds v. Smith
    Search
  24. Syllabus Shaw Etal. V. Murphy
    Search
  25. Gibbs v. Hopkins
    Search
  26. Ruffin v. Commonwealth
    Search
  27. Lee v. Washington
    Search
  28. Bradley v. Hall
    Search
  29. Lewis v. Casey
    Search
  30. Bounds v. Smith
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial