Citation network
Tyler Vs. Cain
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 28, 2001
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 656 (2001) October Term, 2000 Syllabus Tyler V. CainSearch
-
for postconviction relief and a federal habeas petition, all of which were denied. After this Court decided Cage v. LouisianaSearch
-
Congress is permitted to use synonyms in a statute, see Wil liams v. TaylorSearch
-
Cage did not make itself retroactive, and neither did Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
s reasoning makes it clear that retroactive application of Cage is warranted by the principles of Teague v. LaneSearch
-
JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Under Cage v. LouisianaSearch
-
the instruction at issue to permit a finding of guilt without the requisite proof. 498 U. S., at 41. In Estelle v. McGuireSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
postconviction relief. By 1986, he had filed five state petitions, all of which were denied. See State ex rel. Tyler v. BlackburnSearch
-
State v. TylerSearch
-
Tyler v. StateSearch
-
Tyler v. MaggioSearch
-
So. 2d 483 (La. 1982). He next filed a federal habeas petition, which was unsuccessful as well. Tyler v. ButlerSearch
-
No. 88cv4929 (ED La.), aff'd, Tyler v. WhitleySearch
-
Cage claim. The State District Court denied relief, and the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed. State ex rel. Tyler v. CainSearch
-
unconstitutionally, but whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury did so apply it. See also Victor v. NebraskaSearch
-
the merits of Tyler's claim and held that, although Cage should apply retroactively, App. 5-7 (citing Humphrey v. CainSearch
-
b)(4). Relying on Circuit precedent, see Brown v. LensingSearch
-
b)(2)(A). Compare Rodriguez v. SuperintendentSearch
-
In re Hill, 113 F.3d 181 (CAll 1997) (same), with West v. VaughnSearch
-
Davis v. MichiganSearch
-
the Supreme Court does not make a rule retroactive through dictum, which is not binding. Cf. Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. FloridaSearch
-
application of new rules, we do not have license to question the decision on policy grounds. See Connecticut Nat. Bank v. GermainSearch
-
to require as much. In Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
jury instruction violated the Due Process Clause. Tyler argues, however, that a subsequent case, Sullivan v. LouisianaSearch
-
that the reasoning in Sullivan makes clear that retroactive application is warranted by the principles of Teague v. LaneSearch
-
narrow exceptions to the general rule of nonretroactivity. Id., at 311-313 (plurality opinion). See also O'Dell v. NetherlandSearch
-
U. S. 227 , 242 (1990) (quoting Teague, supra, at 311 (plurality opinion), in turn quoting Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
the second Teague exception. The standard for determining whether an error is structural, see generally Arizona v. FulminanteSearch
-
second Teague exception,7 and a 6We also reject Tyler's attempt to find support in our disposition in Adams v. EvattSearch
-
Henry v. RockSearch
-
Appeals would reject a legal premise on which it relied and which may affect the outcome of the litigation. Lawrence v. ChaterSearch
-
U. S. 227 , 242 (1990) (quoting Teague v. LaneSearch
-
U. S. 288 , 311 (1989) (plurality opinion), in turn quoting Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
opinion)) alter such understanding. See, e. g., Sawyer, supra, at 244 (holding that the rule in Caldwell v. MississippiSearch
-
U. S. 151 , 167 (1997) (holding that the rule in Simmons v. SouthSearch
-
see also Caspari v. BohlenSearch
-
cf. Williams v. TaylorSearch
-
easy to demonstrate the required logical relationship with respect to the first exception articulated in Teague v. LaneSearch
-
Id., at 307 (plurality opinion) (quoting Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
see also Sawyer v. SmithSearch
-
Justice Breyer, With Whom Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg Join, Dissenting. in Cage V. LouisianaSearch
-
V). I believe that it has. The Court made Cage retroactive in two cases taken together. Case One is Teague v. LaneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial