Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 27, 2001

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

73 entries 10 linked 63 unlinked
Show
  1. Bush Vs. Lucas US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1983
  2. Alexander Vs. Sandoval US Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2001
  3. Mccarthy Vs. Madigan US Supreme Court · Dec 09, 1991
  4. Schweiker Vs. Chilicky US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1988
  5. Chappell Vs. Wallace US Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1983
  6. Fdic Vs. Meyer US Supreme Court · Oct 04, 1993
    Relied / Followed
  7. United States Vs. Stanley US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1987
  8. Estelle Vs. Gamble US Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1976
  9. Farmer Vs. Brennan US Supreme Court · Jun 06, 1994
  10. Bell Vs. Hood US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1946
  11. U.S. 61 (2001) October Term, 2001 Syllabus Correctional Services Corp. V. Malesko
    Search
  12. Bivens v. Six
    Search
  13. FDIC v. Meyer
    Search
  14. Carlson v. Green
    Search
  15. Davis v. Passman
    Search
  16. Bush v. Lucas
    Search
  17. delivered the opinion of the Court. We decide here whether the implied damages action first recognized in Bivens v. Six
    Search
  18. Id., at 13. The District Court treated the amended complaint as raising claims under Bivens v. Six
    Search
  19. FDIC v. Meyer
    Search
  20. F. 3d, at 380. 66 We granted certiorari, 532 U. S. 902 (2001), and now reverse.2 In Bivens v. Six
    Search
  21. Schweiker v. Chilicky
    Search
  22. had never provided for a private right of action against federal 2The Courts of Appeals have divided on whether FDIC v. Meyer
    Search
  23. U. S. 471 (1994), forecloses the extension of Bivens to private entities. Compare Hammons v. Norfolk
    Search
  24. Kauffman v. Anglo-American
    Search
  25. on earlier decisions implying private damages actions into federal statutes, see id., at 397 (citing J. 1. Case Co. v. Borak
    Search
  26. the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, Davis v. Passman
    Search
  27. U. S. 228 (1979), and the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment, Carlson v. Green
    Search
  28. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First
    Search
  29. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis
    Search
  30. Cannon v. University
    Search
  31. In Bush v. Lucas
    Search
  32. Chappell v. Wallace
    Search
  33. U. S. 296 , 304 (1983), even where the defendants were alleged to have been civilian personnel, United States v. Stanley
    Search
  34. U. S. 669 , 681 (1987). In Schweiker v. Chilicky
    Search
  35. foreclosed judicial imposition of a new substantive liability. Chilicky, supra, at 425-427. Most recently, in FDIC v. Meyer
    Search
  36. Carlson v. Green
    Search
  37. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance
    Search
  38. Estelle v. Gamble
    Search
  39. Farmer v. Brennan
    Search
  40. Boyle v. United
    Search
  41. concurring. I join the opinion of the Court because I agree that a narrow interpretation of the rationale of Bivens v. Six
    Search
  42. Alexander v. Sandoval
    Search
  43. (Davis v. Passman
    Search
  44. U. S. 228 (1979), and Carlson v. Green
    Search
  45. Justice Stevens, With Whom Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer Join, Dissenting. in Bivens V. Six
    Search
  46. Narcotics Agents, 403 U. S. 388 (1971), the Court affirmatively answered the question that it had reserved in Bell v. Hood
    Search
  47. U. S., at 389 (emphasis added). Nearly a 76 decade later, in Carlson v. Green
    Search
  48. Bivens. See Farmer v. Brennan
    Search
  49. is whether the Court should create an exception to the straightforward application of Bivens and 1 See, e. g., FDIC v. Meyer
    Search
  50. FDIC v. Meyer
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial