Citation network
Johnson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 529 U.S. 694 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Johnson V. UnitedSearch
-
date simply indicates that, absent clear congressional direction, it takes effect on its enactment date, Gozlon-Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
of postconfinement monitoring overseen by the sentencing court, rather than the Parole Commission. See Gozlon-Peretz v. UnitedSearch
-
a district court to impose a new term of supervised release following revocation and reimprisonment. See United States v. TrussSearch
-
supervised 2 Of the 11 Circuits to consider the issue, 9 had reached this conclusion. See, e. g., United States v. KoehlerSearch
-
United States v. MalesicSearch
-
United States v. TrussSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. McGeeSearch
-
United States v. BehnezhadSearch
-
United States v. TatumSearch
-
See United States v. O'NeilSearch
-
United States v. SchraderSearch
-
With no retroactivity, there could be no Ex Post Facto Clause violation. See App. 49 (citing United States v. AbbingtonSearch
-
and that it raises the penalty from whatever the law provided when he acted. See California Dept. of Corrections v. MoralesSearch
-
revocation 3 See, e. g., United States v. EskeSearch
-
United States v. LominaeSearch
-
United States v. DozierSearch
-
United States v. CollinsSearch
-
United States v. MeeksSearch
-
h) did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. See United States v. SandovalSearch
-
for the initial offense, however (as most courts have done), avoids these difficulties. See, e. g., United States v. WyattSearch
-
United States v. BealsSearch
-
noncriminal violations must be justified by reference to original crimes), overruled on other grounds, United States v. WithersSearch
-
CA2 1994) (noting absence of constitutional procedural protections in revocation proceedings). Cf. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSearch
-
For that matter, such treatment is all but entailed by our summary affirmance of Greenfield v. ScafatiSearch
-
legislation, especially of the criminal sort, is not to be applied retroactively. See, e. g., Lynce v. MathisSearch
-
Landgraf v. USISearch
-
does not, by itself, tell us when or how that legislative decision was intended to take effect. See Rivers v. RoadwaySearch
-
comment., n. 2 (Nov. 1998) (USSG). So, too, have the federal courts. See, e. g., United States v. HaleSearch
-
took a similar approach in Cisneros v. AlpineSearch
-
way in subsection (3), but it turns out that the unconventional sense is not unheard of. See United States v. O'NeilSearch
-
release) is in tension with the result that customary interpretive rules would deliver. See, e. g., Commissioner v. BrownSearch
-
its words where acceptance of that meaning ... would thwart the obvious purpose of the statute''') (quoting Helvering v. HammelSearch
-
a), a plain meaning approach would find authority for reimposition of supervised release there. Cf. United States v. WesleySearch
-
the odds of a successful transition 709 from the prison to liberty. See, e. g., United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
moreover, in the pre-Guidelines practice with respect to nondetentive monitoring, as illuminated in United States v. O'NeilSearch
-
out of an identifiable predecessor, it is reasonable to look to the precursor in fathoming the new law. Cf. INS v. Cardoza-FonsecaSearch
-
to congressional purpose so long as the congressional language does not itself bar that result. See, e. g., Holloway v. UnitedSearch
-
Caron v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. HeirsSearch
-
United States v. PaskowSearch
-
c) (1982 ed.), see, e. g., Evans v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial