Citation network
Weisgram Vs. Marley Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 22, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Weisgram v. MarleySearch
-
Co. - 528 U.S. 440 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Weisgram Et Al. V. MarleySearch
-
this testimony was unreliable and therefore inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 as elucidated by Daubert v. MerrellSearch
-
for the verdict loser, but must instead remand the case to the trial court for a new trial determination. Neely v. MartinSearch
-
See Brooke Group Ltd. v. BrownSearch
-
testimony plaintiff introduced was unreliable, and therefore inadmissible, under the analysis required by Daubert v. MerrellSearch
-
Procedure 50, which governs the entry of judgment as a matter of law, and by the Court's pathmarking opinion in Neely v. MartinSearch
-
award of a new trial, not judgment as a matter of law. Id., at 522, 525 (citing Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. NorthSearch
-
evidence, because to do so would be unfair to a party who relied on the trial court's evidentiary rulings. See Kinser v. GehlSearch
-
as a matter of law based on proof rendered insufficient by the deletion of improperly admitted evidence. See Redman v. JohnSearch
-
Smelser v. NorfolkSearch
-
Wright v. WillametteSearch
-
accord, Aloe Coal Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Weisgram's experts unreliable, and therefore inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as explicated in Daubert v. MerrellSearch
-
party deprived of a verdict the opportunity to invoke the discretion of the trial judge to grant a new trial. See Cone v. WestSearch
-
Globe Liquor Co. v. SanSearch
-
Johnson v. NewSearch
-
Neely v. MartinSearch
-
for the verdict loser without offense to the Seventh Amendment. 386 U. S., at 321 (citing Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSearch
-
U. S., at 322 (citing Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSearch
-
trial or entry of judgment for the defendant is warranted, or (3) direct the entry of judgment as a matter 7lacurci v. LummusSearch
-
Lightning Lube, Inc. v. WitcoSearch
-
Jackson v. PleasantSearch
-
Douglass v. EatonSearch
-
Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. v. NorthSearch
-
CA8 1973) (same). 9Weisgram misreads the Court's decision in Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSearch
-
The Court in Montgomery Ward directed that a trial judge who grants the verdict loser's motion for judgment n.o. v. shouldSearch
-
The conditional ruling would be reviewed by the court of appeals only if it reversed the entry of judgment n.o. v. ProceedingSearch
-
as it went to the jury, without excising evidence inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. See, e. g., Kinser v. GehlSearch
-
Schudel v. GeneralSearch
-
Midcontinent Broadcasting, 471 F. 2d, at 358. But see Lightning Lube, Inc. v. WitcoSearch
-
see also Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSearch
-
with Eighth Circuit precedent existing at the time of trial in Weisgram's case. See, e. g., Peitzmeier v. HennessySearch
-
of the way that Marley was challenging his experts, he made no attempt to add or substitute other evidence. See Lujan v. NationalSearch
-
a new trial is in order is best made by the trial judge. 386 U. S., at 325-326. Neely held, 13 Cf. Neely v. MartinSearch
-
Syllabus Weisgram Et Al. V. MarleySearch
-
Daubert v. MerrellSearch
-
See Kinser v. GehlSearch
-
See Redman v. JohnSearch
-
Aloe Coal Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
See Cone v. WestSearch
-
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSearch
-
Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSearch
-
Kinser v. GehlSearch
-
Peitzmeier v. HennessySearch
-
See Lujan v. NationalSearch
-
Cf. Neely v. MartinSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial