Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pegram Vs. Herdrich

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 23, 2000

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 2 linked 33 unlinked
Show
  1. Varity Corp. Vs. Howe US Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1996
  2. Lockheed Corp. Vs. Spink US Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1996
  3. U.S. 211 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Pegram Et Al. V. Herdrich
    Search
  4. a clear manifestation of congressional purpose, New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers
    Search
  5. courts have jurisdiction, and we therefore have jurisdiction regardless of the correctness of the removal. See Grubbs v. General
    Search
  6. Mackay v. Uinta
    Search
  7. of social value, such as optimum treatment levels and health-care expenditure. Cf. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
    Search
  8. quoting Walters v. National
    Search
  9. Patsy v. Board
    Search
  10. of disagreements over entitlement to services are the sorts of provisions that constitute a plan. See Hansen v. Continental
    Search
  11. ring of their source in the common law of trusts. See Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central
    Search
  12. Meinhard v. Salmon
    Search
  13. two hats wear only one at a time, and wear the fiduciary hat when making fiduciary decisions. See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson
    Search
  14. ERISA, since an employer's decisions about the content of a plan are not themselves fiduciary acts. Lockheed Corp. v. Spink
    Search
  15. phase of a case on an argument and then relying on a contradictory argument to prevail in another phase. See Rissetto v. Plumbers
    Search
  16. beneficiaries' material interests. See, e. g., Glaziers and Glassworkers Union Local No. 252 Annuity Fund v. Newbridge
    Search
  17. cf. Varity Corp. v. Howe
    Search
  18. Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah
    Search
  19. Alicke v. MCI
    Search
  20. Early v. Bankers
    Search
  21. by limiting care, and some nonprofits actually use incentive schemes similar to that challenged here, see Pulvers v. Kaiser
    Search
  22. toward beneficiaries' interests, Donovan v. Bierwirth
    Search
  23. To be sure, New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers
    Search
  24. Syllabus Pegram Et Al. V. Herdrich
    Search
  25. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers
    Search
  26. See Grubbs v. General
    Search
  27. Cf. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
    Search
  28. Walters v. National
    Search
  29. See Hansen v. Continental
    Search
  30. See Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central
    Search
  31. See Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson
    Search
  32. See Rissetto v. Plumbers
    Search
  33. Annuity Fund v. Newbridge
    Search
  34. Pulvers v. Kaiser
    Search
  35. Donovan v. Bierwirth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial