Citation network
Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 18, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
Williams V. TaylorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Warden - 529 U.S. 362 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Williams V. TaylorSearch
-
and present significant mitigating evidence violated his right to the effective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
inter alia, that the trial judge had failed to recognize that Strickland had been modified by Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
that the Virginia Supreme Court apply that test in entertaining Williams' ineffectiveassistance claim. See Teague v. LaneSearch
-
fairness may affect the analysis, see Strickland, 466 U. S., at 692, cases such as Lockhart and Nix v. WhitesideSearch
-
ask whether the state court's application of clearly established federal law was objectively unreasonable. Cf. Wright v. WestSearch
-
decision. In this respect, the quoted phrase bears only a slight connection to this Court's jurisprudence under Teague v. LaneSearch
-
see, e. g., Stringer v. BlackSearch
-
are whether Terry Williams' constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel as defined in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
the death sentence. Id., at 154. The Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence. Williams v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Va. 168, 360 S. E. 2d 361 (1987), cert. denied, Williams v. VirginiaSearch
-
did not measure up to the standard required under the holding of Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
on the sentencing phase of his trial. The Virginia Supreme Court did not accept that recommendation. Williams v. WardenSearch
-
but held that the trial judge had misapplied the law in two respects. First, relying on our decision in Lockhart v. FretwellSearch
-
Id., at 865 (quoting Green v. FrenchSearch
-
not alone be sufficient reason for concluding that a prisoner is entitled to the remedy of habeas. See, e. g., Stone v. PowellSearch
-
fairness of the state adjudication certainly justify the issuance of the federal writ. See, e. g., Teague v. LaneSearch
-
U. S. 288 , 311-314 (1989) (quoting Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 667 , 692-694 (1971) (Harlan, J., concurring in judgments in part and dissenting in part), and quoting Rose v. LundySearch
-
the Court of Appeals applied the construction of the amendment that it had adopted in its earlier opinion in Green v. FrenchSearch
-
requirement In Teague v. LaneSearch
-
Ex parte Hawk, 321 U. S. 114 (1944) (per curiam), and the abuse of the writ doctrine applied in Sanders v. UnitedSearch
-
as we stated in Miller v. FentonSearch
-
was an almost verbatim codification of the standards delineated in Townsend v. SainSearch
-
Mackey, 401 U. S., at 695 (quoting Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
by state courts. 383 Brief for California et al. as Amici Curiae 6 (quoting Butler v. McKellarSearch
-
would agree the rule was not clearly established. Sawyer v. SmithSearch
-
decisions, and give them full effect when their findings and judgments are consistent with federal law. See Thompson v. KeohaneSearch
-
review of so-called mixed questions of law and fact. See, e. g., Neelley v. NagleSearch
-
Drinkard v. JohnsonSearch
-
the governing rule of law. Cf. Miller v. FentonSearch
-
that the Federal Judiciary must respect. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
courts the way we treat federal administrative agencies. Deference after the fashion of Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. NaturalSearch
-
Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 ... (1984), depends on delegation. See Adams Fruit Co. v. BarrettSearch
-
standard advocated by JUSTICE THOMAS in his opinion in Wright v. WestSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial