Citation network
Edwards Vs. Carpenter
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 25, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 446 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus Edwards, Warden V. CarpenterSearch
-
standard are grounded in comity and federalism concerns, Coleman v. ThompsonSearch
-
U. S. 722 , 730, and apply whether the default occurred at trial, on appeal, or on state collateral attack, Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
He entered a guilty plea while maintaining his innocence-a procedure we held to be constitutional in North Carolina v. AlfordSearch
-
G. Summers of Tennessee, Jan Graham of Utah, William H. Sorrell of Vermont, Christine Q Gregoire of Washington, Darrell v. McGrawSearch
-
after the 90-day period allowed.2 The Ohio Supreme Court, in a one-sentence per curiam opinion, affirmed. State v. CarpenterSearch
-
Rule 26(B)'s inconsistent application by the Ohio courts rendered it inadequate to bar federal habeas review. See Ford v. GeorgiaSearch
-
that respondent's appellate counsel was constitutionally ineffective under the test established in Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the-evidence claim, whether or not the ineffective-assistance claim itself had been procedurally defaulted. Carpenter v. MohrSearch
-
apply alike whether the default in question occurred at trial, on appeal, or on state collateral attack, Mur ray v. CarrierSearch
-
before his procedurally defaulted ineffective-assistance claim will excuse the default of another claim. Stewart v. LaGrandSearch
-
U. S., at 732. We again considered the interplay between exhaustion and procedural default last Term in O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSearch
-
Id., at 854 (STEVENS, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (quoting Darr v. BurfordSearch
-
state-law ground justifies the prisoner's detention, regardless of the federal claim. 455 See Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
James v. KentuckySearch
-
See, e. g., Schlup v. DeloSearch
-
in the same manner. Murray v. CarrierSearch
-
Syllabus Edwards, Warden V. CarpenterSearch
-
State v. CarpenterSearch
-
See Ford v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Strickland v. WashingtonSearch
-
Carpenter v. MohrSearch
-
Stewart v. LaGrandSearch
-
See Wainwright v. SykesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial