Citation network
United States Vs. Hubbell
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 05, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 27 (2000) October Term, 1999 Syllabus United States V. HubbellSearch
-
within the meaning of the privilege. See Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
it provides is coextensive with the scope of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
the documents was the fruit only of the simple physical act of production. In addition, the Government misreads Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 425 U. S., at 411, and ignores United States v. DoeSearch
-
him to answer questions designed to uncover uncharged offenses, without evidence from another source. See Andresen v. MarylandSearch
-
Doe v. UnitedSearch
-
sworn communication by a witness that relates either express or implied assertions of fact or belief. Penn sylvania v. MunizSearch
-
Holt v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 218 U. S. 245 , 252-253 (1910). 10 Ibid. 11 Schmerber v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 757 (1966). 12 Gilbert v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 263 (1967). 13 United States v. WadeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 218 (1967). 14 United States v. SullivanSearch
-
U. S. 259 (1927). 15 Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 335 U. S. 1 (1948). 16 California v. ByersSearch
-
Baltimore City Dept. of Social Servs. v. BouknightSearch
-
U. S. 549 , 556 (1990). 36 within the meaning of the privilege. Our decision in Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
see also United States v. DoeSearch
-
the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. DoeSearch
-
id., at 428, 432 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. UnitedSearch
-
Hoffman v. UnitedSearch
-
is privileged even if the information itself is not inculpatory. Doe v. UnitedSearch
-
App. 60-61. In Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
from the 1868 statute that had been held invalid in Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
Id., at 454 (quoting Ull mann v. UnitedSearch
-
Kastigar v. UnitedSearch
-
in identifying the hundreds of documents responsive to the requests in the subpoena. See Curcio v. UnitedSearch
-
under our decision in Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S., at 411. This argument both misreads Fisher and ignores our subsequent decision in United States v. DoeSearch
-
at the time of the founding a person who turned over documents would be described as providing testimony. See Amey v. LongSearch
-
supra, at 1618-1623. Several 18th-century cases explicitly recognized such a self-incrimination privilege. See Roe v. HarveySearch
-
King v. PurnellSearch
-
King v. CorneliusSearch
-
Queen v. MeadSearch
-
King v. WorsenhamSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 116 U. S. 616 , 631 (1886). See also Counselman v. HitchcockSearch
-
were not simply descriptions of the act of providing testimony. For example, in King v. PurnellSearch
-
in response to a government request. Id., at 40, 41, 42, 96 Eng. Rep., at 21, 22, 23. See also, e. g., King v. CorneliusSearch
-
to interpret the Compulsory Process Clause while presiding over the treason trial of Aaron Burr. United States v. BurrSearch
-
at 34-35. This Court has subsequently expressed agreement with this view of the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. NixonSearch
-
approach to the Fifth Amendment that we follow today. The first case interpreting the Self-Incrimination Clause-Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. See White v. IllinoisSearch
-
law understanding of the self-incrimination privilege. Id., at 631-632. But this Court's decision in Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
Syllabus United States V. HubbellSearch
-
See Fisher v. UnitedSearch
-
Fisher v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial