Citation network
Eastern Associated Coal Corp. Vs. Mine Workers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 28, 2000
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. MineSearch
-
Workers - 531 U.S. 57 (2000) October Term, 2000 Syllabus Eastern Associated Coal Corp. V. UnitedSearch
-
see Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
here that the arbitrator acted outside the scope of his contractually delegated authority, see, e. g., Paperworkers v. MiscoSearch
-
W R. Grace & Co. v. RubberSearch
-
As- 58 58 Eastern Associated Coal Corp. V. MineSearch
-
arbitration when chosen as a result of labor-management negotiation. See, e. g., California Brewers Assn. v. BryantSearch
-
Academy of Arbitrators as amicus curiae urging affirmance. 60 60 EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORP. v. MINESearch
-
with, e. g., Exxon Corp. v. EssoSearch
-
See Steelwork- 62 62 Eastern Associated Coal Corp. V. MineSearch
-
WORKERS ers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
Paperworkers v. MiscoSearch
-
legal precedents and not from general considerations of supposed public interests.''' Ibid. (quoting Muschany v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Stat. 953. the Act 64 64 Eastern Associated Coal Corp. V. MineSearch
-
with labormanagement agreements about appropriate employee discipline. See, e. g., California Brewers Assn. v. BryantSearch
-
policy exception is not limited solely to instances where the arbitra- 68 68 EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL CORP. v. MINESearch
-
is not a single decision, since this Court washed its hands of general common-lawmaking authority, see Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
grounds an agreement that did not violate, or provide for the violation of, some positive law. See, e. g., Hurd v. HodgeSearch
-
Workers, 461 U. S. 757 , 766 (1983) (quoting Muschany v. UnitedSearch
-
of the omissions of the political branches when we declined the power to define common-law offenses. See United States v. HudsonSearch
-
Syllabus Eastern Associated Coal Corp. V. UnitedSearch
-
Steelworkers v. EnterpriseSearch
-
Exxon Corp. v. EssoSearch
-
Muschany v. UnitedSearch
-
Erie R. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
See United States v. HudsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial