Citation network
Florida Vs. White
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 559 (1999) October Term, 1998 Syllabus Florida V. WhiteSearch
-
the action was regarded as an unlawful search and seizure when the Amendment was framed. See, e. g., Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
a public area, the warrantless seizure is virtually indistinguishable from the seizure upheld in G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
a) (1997). 2 Nothing in the Act requires the police to obtain a warrant prior to seizing a vehicle. See State v. PomeranceSearch
-
justify a warrantless seizure. The court expressly rejected the holding of the Eleventh Circuit, see United States v. ValdesSearch
-
which is similar to Florida's. See United States v. DeckerSearch
-
United States v. PaceSearch
-
United States v. OneSearch
-
United States v. KempSearch
-
United States v. BushSearch
-
F.2d 357 (CA3 1981). But see United States v. DixonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States v. LasantaSearch
-
inquire whether the action was regarded as an unlawful search and seizure when the Amendment was framed. See Wyoming v. HoughtonSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
see also California v. CarneySearch
-
arrests in public places where an officer has probable cause to believe that a felony has occurred. See United States v. WatsonSearch
-
Payton v. NewSearch
-
at issue in this case. Indeed, the facts of this case are nearly indistinguishable from those in G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
in the interest of law enforcement, as legislatures are evincing increasing ingenuity in doing, cf., e. g., Bennis v. MichiganSearch
-
United States v. JamesSearch
-
dissenting in part) (expressing concern about the breadth of new forfeiture statutes). Moreover, G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
traditional enforcement of government revenue laws, id., at 351-352, and n. 18 (citing, e. g., Murray's Lessee v. HobokenSearch
-
How. 272 (1856)), and the legality of seizing abandoned contraband in public view, 429 U. S., at 352 (citing Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
and seizures as well as searches, Soldal v. CookSearch
-
seizure under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. See 710 So. 2d, at 952 (discussing Department of Law Enforcement v. RealSearch
-
have no authority to determine the limits of state constitutional or statutory safeguards. 2 E. g., United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
interest. Nevertheless, I would look to the warrant clause as a measure of reasonableness in such cases, United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Harris v. UnitedSearch
-
overruled in part by Chimel v. CaliforniaSearch
-
see also Shadwick v. TampaSearch
-
Wong Sun 3 See, e. g., Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
cf. United States v. JamesSearch
-
had the State relied on the plain-view doctrine, perhaps a warrantless seizure would have been defensible. See Horton v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 321 , 327 (1987) (citing Payton v. NewSearch
-
Austin v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 509 U. S. 602 , 621 (1993) (quoting One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
involve a serious intrusion on the rights of innocent persons with no connection to the earlier offense. Cf. Bennis v. MichiganSearch
-
by a routine and predictable inventory search- 5 There is some force to the majority's reliance on United States v. WatsonSearch
-
interjects the judgment of a neutral decisionmaker, one with no pecuniary interest in the matter, see Connally v. GeorgiaSearch
-
the property shifts to the individual. Knowing that a neutral party 6 The Court's reliance on G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Syllabus Florida V. WhiteSearch
-
G. M. Leasing Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
See State v. PomeranceSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial