Citation network
Clinton Vs. Goldsmith
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 17, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 529 (1999) October Term, 1998 Syllabus Clinton, President of the United States, Et Al. V. GoldsmithSearch
-
a). Although military appellate courts are among those so empowered to issue extraordinary writs, see Noyd v. BondSearch
-
their existing statutory jurisdiction, see, e. g., Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. UnitedSearch
-
such, not generally available to provide alternatives to other, adequate remedies at law. See, e. g., Carlisle v. UnitedSearch
-
in this case, we do not reach the merits of respondent's double jeopardy and ex post facto claims. 534 v. UnitedSearch
-
c).5 Cf. Parisi v. DavidsonSearch
-
although military appellate courts are among those empowered to issue extraordinary writs under the Act, see Noyd v. BondSearch
-
the Act does not enlarge that jurisdiction, see, e. g., Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. UnitedSearch
-
Writs power would allow the appellate court to compel adherence to its own judgment. See, e. g., United States v. UnitedSearch
-
in custody has exhausted other avenues provided under the UCMJ to seek relief from his conviction, see Noyd v. BondSearch
-
claiming that his conviction is affected by a fundamental defect that requires that it be set aside. See, e. g., Burns v. WilsonSearch
-
U. S. 137 , 142 (1953) (opinion of Vinson, C. J.). See also Calley v. CallawaySearch
-
Gorko v. CommandingSearch
-
Force BCMR has the power to correct a record that is erroneous as a result of a constitutional violation. Cf. Guerra v. ScruggsSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Bois v. MarshSearch
-
quoting Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
For examples of such challenges entertained in the district courts or courts of appeals, see Roelofs v. SecretarySearch
-
Walker v. ShannonSearch
-
See, e. g., Doe v. UnitedSearch
-
Mitchell v. UnitedSearch
-
a)(2).14 See, e. g., Thomas v. CheneySearch
-
Sibley v. BallSearch
-
Syllabus Clinton, President of the United States, Et Al. V. GoldsmithSearch
-
Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. UnitedSearch
-
Carlisle v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Parisi v. DavidsonSearch
-
United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Calley v. CallawaySearch
-
Cf. Guerra v. ScruggsSearch
-
Roelofs v. SecretarySearch
-
Doe v. UnitedSearch
-
Thomas v. CheneySearch
-
Noyd v. BondSearch
-
Burns v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial