Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Dickinson Vs. Zurko

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 10, 1999

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

86 entries 1 linked 85 unlinked
Show
  1. Cantrell Vs. Wallick US Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1886
  2. U.S. 150 (1999) October Term, 1998 Syllabus Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks V. Zurko
    Search
  3. court review. Although the Court in Morgan v. Daniels
    Search
  4. maintaining a uniform approach to judicial review of administrative action, see, e. g., Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  5. agency review standards. See, e. g., Polish National Alliance v. NLRB
    Search
  6. New York Trust Co. v. SEC
    Search
  7. Hall v. Commissioner
    Search
  8. First National Bank of Memphis v. Commissioner
    Search
  9. NLRB v. Algoma
    Search
  10. including appeals in patent infringement cases challenging district court factfinding). See, e. g., Cornell v. Chase
    Search
  11. Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton
    Search
  12. Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Ford
    Search
  13. Electro Mfg. Co. v. Yellin
    Search
  14. Ajax Hand Brake Co. v. Superior
    Search
  15. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith
    Search
  16. to explain why it would not disturb a trial court's factual findings. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Ten
    Search
  17. see also Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Grosjean
    Search
  18. in the agency context to describe its approach to the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC's) factual findings, ICC v. Union
    Search
  19. The Court did not immediately grant the Federal Trade Commission the same leeway it granted the ICC, see FTC v. Curtis
    Search
  20. when Congress had left it out. See, e. g., Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  21. see also Dobson v. Commissioner
    Search
  22. see also Association of Data Processing Service Orgs., Inc. v. Board
    Search
  23. court review. The Federal Circuit traced its standard of review back to Morgan v. Daniels
    Search
  24. standard. Ibid. (citing Cantrell v. Wallick
    Search
  25. U. S. 689 , 695 (1886), and Coffin v. Ogden
    Search
  26. NLRB v. Link-Belt
    Search
  27. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United
    Search
  28. ICC v. Louisville
    Search
  29. given for deferring to factfinding made by a lower court judge. See, e. g., Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction
    Search
  30. Copyright Section of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia as Amicus Curiae 23 (quoting Square D Co. v. Niagara
    Search
  31. that an error has been committed. United States v. United
    Search
  32. than the other would in fact have produced a different outcome. Cf. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. NLRB
    Search
  33. standard. Gould v. Quigg
    Search
  34. in this opinion prevents the Federal Circuit from adjusting related review standards where necessary. Cf. Fregeau v. Mossinghoff
    Search
  35. Agency Expertise and the Agreement (Disagreement) Within the Agency Stern v. Schroeder
    Search
  36. C. C. P. A. 1181, 1184, 48 F.2d 657, 658 (1931) 166 Appendix to opinion of the Court Dorer v. Moody
    Search
  37. F.2d 388, 389 (1931) In re Hornsey, 18 C. C. P. A. 1222, 1224, 48 F.2d 911, 912 (1931) Rowe v. Holtz
    Search
  38. F.2d 468, 470471 (1932) In re Fessenden, 19 C. C. P. A. 1048, 1050-1051, 56 F.2d 669, 670 (1932) Martin v. Friendly
    Search
  39. F.2d 374, 377 (1933) In re Alden, 20 C. C. P. A. 1083, 1084-1085, 65 F.2d 136, 137 (1933) Farmer v. Pritchard
    Search
  40. F.2d 165, 168 (1933) In re Pierce, 20 C. C. P. A. 1170, 1175, 65 F.2d 271, 274 (1933) Angell v. Morin
    Search
  41. C. C. P. A. 1018, 1024, 69 F.2d 646, 649 (1934) Daley v. Trube
    Search
  42. C. C. P. A. 964, 971, 88 F.2d 308, 312 (1937) Coast v. Dubbs
    Search
  43. C. C. P. A. 1023, 1031-1032,88 F.2d 734, 739 (1937) Bryson v. Clarke
    Search
  44. C. C. P. A. 719, 721, 92 F.2d 720, 722 (1937) Brand v. Thomas
    Search
  45. C. C. P. A. 1053, 1055, 96 F.2d 301, 302 (1938) Creed v. Potts
    Search
  46. A. 1084, 1089, 96 F.2d 317, 321 (1938) In re Cassidy, 25 C. C. P. A. 1282, 1285, 97 F.2d 93, 95 (1938) Krebs v. Melicharek
    Search
  47. C. C. P. A. 1362, 1365-1366, 97 F.2d 477, 479 (1938) Parker v. Ballantine
    Search
  48. C. C. P. A. 799,804, 101 F.2d 220, 223 (1939) (disagreement) 167 Reed v. Edwards
    Search
  49. C. C. P. A. 901, 904, 101 F.2d 550, 552 (1939) Hill v. Casler
    Search
  50. C. C. P. A. 930, 932, 102 F.2d 219, 221 (1939) Tears v. Robinson
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial