Citation network
Cunningham Vs. Hamilton County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 14, 1999
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Cunningham v. HamiltonSearch
-
County - 527 U.S. 198 (1999) October Term, 1998 Syllabus Cunningham V. HamiltonSearch
-
the merits, and are effectively unreviewable on appeal from the final judgment in the underlying action, e. g., Swint v. ChambersSearch
-
it neither ended the litigation nor left the court only to execute its judgment, see, e. g., Midland Asphalt Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
a Rule 37(a) sanctions order, however, cannot remain completely separate from the merits. See, e. g., Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
where they might have a personal interest in seeking vindication from the sanctions order. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. KollerSearch
-
four witnesses-Rex Smith, Roxanne Dieffenbach, and two individual defendants-be deposed on July 25, 1996. Starcher v. CorrectionalSearch
-
for the Sixth Circuit. The Court of Appeals, over a dissent, dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Starcher v. CorrectionalSearch
-
Swint v. ChambersSearch
-
County Comm'n, 514 U. S. 35, 42 (1995) (citing Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Compare, e. g., Eastern Maico Distributors, Inc. v. Maico-FahrzeugfabrikSearch
-
F.2d 944 , 946-951 (CA3 1981) (order not immediately appealable), with Telluride Management Solutions, Inc. v. TellurideSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Midland Asphalt Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
that an appeal ordinarily will not lie until after final judgment has been entered in a case. See, e. g., Quackenbush v. AllstateSearch
-
Digital Equipment Corp. v. DesktopSearch
-
U. S. 424 , 430 (1985). As we explained in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
U. S. 517 , 521-522 (1988) (quoting Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. MetcalfSearch
-
an order directed at a party to the litigation is immediately appealable. E. g., Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
become final merely because it is directed at someone other than a plaintiff or defendant. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. KollerSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
importance of the information sought or the adequacy or truthfulness of a response. See, e. g., Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. SaraSearch
-
order, but not held in contempt, generally may not appeal the order. See, e. g., United States Catholic Conference v. AbortionSearch
-
Cobbledick v. UnitedSearch
-
Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. CassattSearch
-
Alexander v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 201 U. S. 117 , 121 (1906). 206 v. NewSearch
-
Evanson v. UnionSearch
-
of decisions holding that one who is not a party to a judgment generally may not appeal from it. See, e. g., Karcher v. MaySearch
-
substantially from the parties', attorneys assume an ethical obligation to serve their clients' interests. Evans v. JeffSearch
-
see also Flanagan v. UnitedSearch
-
against treating attorneys like other nonparties for purposes of appeal. Cf. United States Catholic Conference v. AbortionSearch
-
Willy v. CoastalSearch
-
if the trial court abused its discretion in issuing the order or denying the stay. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. KollerSearch
-
Products Antitrust Litigation, 747 F.2d 1303 , 1305-1306 (CA9 1984). In United States Catholic Conference v. AbortionSearch
-
Syllabus Cunningham V. HamiltonSearch
-
See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. KollerSearch
-
Starcher v. CorrectionalSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Eastern Maico Distributors, Inc. v. Maico-FahrzeugfabrikSearch
-
Telluride Management Solutions, Inc. v. TellurideSearch
-
Quackenbush v. AllstateSearch
-
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSearch
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
Thomas E. Hoar, Inc. v. SaraSearch
-
United States Catholic Conference v. AbortionSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial